Quality Control Assessment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Design) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Design= | =Design= | ||
#Were some parts too big or too small? | #Were some parts too big or too small? | ||
#Did any parts or modules have to be modified to fit properly? | |||
#Were there parts that did not fit? Explain. | #Were there parts that did not fit? Explain. | ||
#What design changes and additions should be made for the next iteration of a build? | #What design changes and additions should be made for the next iteration of a build? |
Revision as of 03:14, 17 July 2013
This is a general quality control checklist for heavy machinery.
Design
- Were some parts too big or too small?
- Did any parts or modules have to be modified to fit properly?
- Were there parts that did not fit? Explain.
- What design changes and additions should be made for the next iteration of a build?
- Did the machine have the expected power or performance?
- What things had to be modified between the CAD model and the actual build?
- Which missing design features were added during the build that were not part of the CAD model?
Mechanical
- Did all the parts fit together as expected? If not, please explain.
- Were sharp edges and exposed rough torching areas ground down with a grinder?
- Do all pins have a head on one side and a cotter pin on the other?
Welding and Fasteners
- Discuss any welds that failed inspection.
- Did all the bolts fit as expected? If not, pleas explain what prevented them from fitting.
- Did any bolt lengths have to be modified? Please explain.
Hydraulics
- Did any hydraulic fittings or hoses leak? How was this corrected?
- Did all motors and cylinders work?
- Were the correct fittings used? Which fittings should be replaced?
- Were there any fittings that did not work and had to be modified?
- Were there any cylinder tabs that had to be modified because