OSE Specifications for Product Design: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
To assess the technological design features of [[OSE Specifications]], these are the most important:
To assess the technological design features of [[OSE Specifications]], these are the most important:
#Lifetime Design. Achieved largely by bolt-together, [[Space Frame]] design.  
#Lifetime Design. Achieved largely by bolt-together, [[Space Frame]] construction.  
#Design for Scalability
#Design for Scalability. [[Intensive and Extensive Scalability]].
#Modular Design
#Modular Design. Hydralics and bolt-together space frames facilitate this.
#Design for Fabrication
#Design for Fabrication. Design for minimal fabrication steps. Design for common parts.
#Simplicity. Minimal parts count. Maximum redundancy of part types.
#Simplicity. Minimal parts count. Maximum redundancy of part types.
#Low cost. Off-shelf parts. Minimum machining.
#Low cost. Off-shelf parts. Minimum machining.
#Meeting or exceeding industry standards
#Meeting or exceeding industry standards. Overbuild with Space Frames.
#Machine fit as part of a greater product ecology - on the component level, module level, and  
#Machine fit as part of a greater product ecology - on the component level, module level, and  
#Designed as a Product Ecology - at the component, module, and machine level.
#Designed as a Product Ecology - at the component, module, and machine level.


The development process itself follows:
The development process itself follows:

Revision as of 03:16, 2 August 2013

To assess the technological design features of OSE Specifications, these are the most important:

  1. Lifetime Design. Achieved largely by bolt-together, Space Frame construction.
  2. Design for Scalability. Intensive and Extensive Scalability.
  3. Modular Design. Hydralics and bolt-together space frames facilitate this.
  4. Design for Fabrication. Design for minimal fabrication steps. Design for common parts.
  5. Simplicity. Minimal parts count. Maximum redundancy of part types.
  6. Low cost. Off-shelf parts. Minimum machining.
  7. Meeting or exceeding industry standards. Overbuild with Space Frames.
  8. Machine fit as part of a greater product ecology - on the component level, module level, and
  9. Designed as a Product Ecology - at the component, module, and machine level.


The development process itself follows:

  1. Test-Driven Design
  2. Modular Design
  3. Interface Design (Contract-First Manufacturing)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=OSE_Specifications_for_Product_Design&oldid=102719"