Open Bidding Collaboration Architecture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<html><img src="https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1Z1BQyobFD0HJtkamzAJGCmb_oSdgicwAlrL5NvnfXKQ/pub?w=700"></html> [https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/drawings/d...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Simplest implementation: | Simplest implementation: | ||
*Draw up RFPs. These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined. | *Draw up Requests for Bids/Proposals (RFPs). These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined. | ||
:*Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See [[Chunkworks]]. | :*Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See [[Chunkworks]]. | ||
*'''Bidders review RFPs and submit Open Bids'''. Open process allows anybody to upload work product to the OSE Wiki. All work is submitted under the current CC-BY-SA license. Open sharing of results encourages others to collaborate and build upon each others' work. Bids are logged simply as entries on wiki pages. | *'''Bidders review RFPs and submit Open Bids'''. Open process allows anybody to upload work product to the OSE Wiki. All work is submitted under the current CC-BY-SA license. Open sharing of results encourages others to collaborate and build upon each others' work. Bids are logged simply as entries on wiki pages. | ||
*Donations are shown in a funding basket icon. | *Donations are shown in a funding basket icon. | ||
*Crowds vote for the winner. Judging criterion: quality of product AND quality of collaboration. When two comparable results are proposed, the one which showed more collaboration wins. Collaboration is assessed by how much a person borrowed from other bidders, and how much of their work was adopted by others. | *Crowds vote for the winner. Judging criterion: quality of product AND quality of collaboration. When two comparable results are proposed, the one which showed more collaboration wins. Collaboration is assessed by how much a person borrowed from other bidders, and how much of their work was adopted by others. | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 16 March 2014
Simplest implementation:
- Draw up Requests for Bids/Proposals (RFPs). These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined.
- Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See Chunkworks.
- Bidders review RFPs and submit Open Bids. Open process allows anybody to upload work product to the OSE Wiki. All work is submitted under the current CC-BY-SA license. Open sharing of results encourages others to collaborate and build upon each others' work. Bids are logged simply as entries on wiki pages.
- Donations are shown in a funding basket icon.
- Crowds vote for the winner. Judging criterion: quality of product AND quality of collaboration. When two comparable results are proposed, the one which showed more collaboration wins. Collaboration is assessed by how much a person borrowed from other bidders, and how much of their work was adopted by others.