Talk:RISC-V: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lex Berezhny (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (added a timestamp to my earlier comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
-Exciting indeed. Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is it comparable to a raspberry pi/arduino in power, or somewhere along an Intel chip? | -Exciting indeed. Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is it comparable to a raspberry pi/arduino in power, or somewhere along an Intel chip? --[[User:Eric|talk]]) 04:55, 14 November 2017 (CET) | ||
It's closer to raspberry pi than arduino. But you should read the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V wiki page on wikipedia], the use cases for RISC-V are detailed in the first couple of paragraphs ;-) --[[User:Lex Berezhny|Lex Berezhny]] ([[User talk:Lex Berezhny|talk]]) 05:00, 14 November 2017 (CET) | It's closer to raspberry pi than arduino. But you should read the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V wiki page on wikipedia], the use cases for RISC-V are detailed in the first couple of paragraphs ;-) --[[User:Lex Berezhny|Lex Berezhny]] ([[User talk:Lex Berezhny|talk]]) 05:00, 14 November 2017 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 14 November 2017
-Exciting indeed. Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is it comparable to a raspberry pi/arduino in power, or somewhere along an Intel chip? --talk) 04:55, 14 November 2017 (CET)
It's closer to raspberry pi than arduino. But you should read the wiki page on wikipedia, the use cases for RISC-V are detailed in the first couple of paragraphs ;-) --Lex Berezhny (talk) 05:00, 14 November 2017 (CET)