FIT XM Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Graded 1-5 stars. As applicable, 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80%, 3 stars is 60%, etc. *Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This evaluation certifies instructors to teach XM Workshops. | |||
Graded 1-5 stars. As applicable, 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80%, 3 stars is 60%, etc. | Graded 1-5 stars. As applicable, 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80%, 3 stars is 60%, etc. | ||
*Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran over 2 hours. 2 stars if 3 hour overrun. | *Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran over 2 hours. 2 stars if 3 hour overrun. | ||
*Did everyone | *Was there a sample model of a 3D printer available for students to observe for their own build? | ||
*Were the materials packaged and laid out clearly for each builder? | |||
*Was there an inventory list provided with each kit? | |||
*Were the 3D printed parts all clean, or did they require cleaning or processing? 5 stars if used as they came off the printer and no cleaning had to be done - 4 stars if there was loose plastic/support/raft attached to the prints and it took 15 minutes or longer to clean, 3 stars and so on for every 15 minutes to clean. of cleaning/drilling/processing time. | |||
*Did each builder have a proper tool set for the build? | |||
*Did everyone achieve a successful 3D print? | |||
*Did the software work right out of the box? | |||
*Did the students follow a quality control checklist successfully, or were there missing quality control steps (either on the part of the student or on part of the QC list)? | |||
*Did the Fellow perform checks according to a final quality control checklist prior to first fire? | |||
*Did the bed leveling procedure succeed within 15 minutes? 4 stars if it took 10 minutes longer, and another star off for every successive 10 minutes | |||
*Were all components and parts in working order in each kit? | *Were all components and parts in working order in each kit? | ||
*Were their replacement parts available for any broken or missing parts? | *Were their replacement parts available for any broken or missing parts? | ||
*Was the Build Manual complete and accurate? | *Was everyone able to access the Build Manual, and was the build manual complete and accurate? | ||
*Did the Fellow provide teachable moments to participants | *Did the Fellow provide teachable moments to participants and was the Fellow's attitude supportive? Was the Fellow able to answer build questions properly? | ||
*Reviews. What star rating did participants provide? See [[Workshop_Feedback_Form]] | *Reviews. What star rating did participants provide? See [[Workshop_Feedback_Form]] | ||
*Did participants say they would recommend the workshop to someone else? | *Did participants say they would recommend the workshop to someone else? | ||
Latest revision as of 17:46, 2 September 2018
This evaluation certifies instructors to teach XM Workshops.
Graded 1-5 stars. As applicable, 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80%, 3 stars is 60%, etc.
- Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran over 2 hours. 2 stars if 3 hour overrun.
- Was there a sample model of a 3D printer available for students to observe for their own build?
- Were the materials packaged and laid out clearly for each builder?
- Was there an inventory list provided with each kit?
- Were the 3D printed parts all clean, or did they require cleaning or processing? 5 stars if used as they came off the printer and no cleaning had to be done - 4 stars if there was loose plastic/support/raft attached to the prints and it took 15 minutes or longer to clean, 3 stars and so on for every 15 minutes to clean. of cleaning/drilling/processing time.
- Did each builder have a proper tool set for the build?
- Did everyone achieve a successful 3D print?
- Did the software work right out of the box?
- Did the students follow a quality control checklist successfully, or were there missing quality control steps (either on the part of the student or on part of the QC list)?
- Did the Fellow perform checks according to a final quality control checklist prior to first fire?
- Did the bed leveling procedure succeed within 15 minutes? 4 stars if it took 10 minutes longer, and another star off for every successive 10 minutes
- Were all components and parts in working order in each kit?
- Were their replacement parts available for any broken or missing parts?
- Was everyone able to access the Build Manual, and was the build manual complete and accurate?
- Did the Fellow provide teachable moments to participants and was the Fellow's attitude supportive? Was the Fellow able to answer build questions properly?
- Reviews. What star rating did participants provide? See Workshop_Feedback_Form
- Did participants say they would recommend the workshop to someone else?