3D Printer Production Engineering: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Kits= | =Kits= | ||
Based on the notes at [[Kit Certification]] - there is a significant value proposition behind distributed production of 3D printer kits based on the OSE 3D printer design. Our unique value proposition is that one can build our printer from common, off-the-shelf-parts - and attain industrial performance. This is not the same as Prusa ([[ | Based on the notes at [[Kit Certification]] - there is a significant value proposition behind distributed production of 3D printer kits based on the OSE 3D printer design. | ||
Our unique value proposition that enables distributed production is that one can build our printer from common, off-the-shelf-parts - and attain industrial performance. This is not the same as Prusa ([[OS]]?, Lulzbot ([[OS]]), or Jellybox ([[FOS]]) - 3 leading printers. | |||
The question remains if distributed quality control can succeed in producing high quality products in a distributed fashion. | |||
=Printer Build= | =Printer Build= | ||
*[[Kit Production Ergonomics]] | *[[Kit Production Ergonomics]] | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 3 December 2018
Kits
Based on the notes at Kit Certification - there is a significant value proposition behind distributed production of 3D printer kits based on the OSE 3D printer design.
Our unique value proposition that enables distributed production is that one can build our printer from common, off-the-shelf-parts - and attain industrial performance. This is not the same as Prusa (OS?, Lulzbot (OS), or Jellybox (FOS) - 3 leading printers.
The question remains if distributed quality control can succeed in producing high quality products in a distributed fashion.