OSE Enterprise Brainstorming: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
*[[Innocentive]]  model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
*[[Innocentive]]  model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness).
*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]


=OSE Narrative=
=OSE Narrative=

Revision as of 16:29, 20 February 2019

Possible approaches:

  • Jams
  • Hackathons
  • Design Sprints
  • Startup Weekend - twist being - we are a distributed team, and teams start enterprises for different locations that are doing the same thing for common production
  • Coopetition - like FIRST Robotics
  • Meetup
  • Incentive Challenge - organize a large number of sponsors interested in a technology, with a promise to produce at low cost via preorders
  • Crowd Supply model - helping developers bring products to life. Electronics only.
  • Local Motors model - incentive challenges, results not public
  • HeroX model - incentive challenge; open to anyone
  • FIRST Robotics model - coopetitions - but add purpose to it
  • GrabCAD - incentive challenges - designs remain free.
  • L'Atelier Paysan - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools.
  • China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
  • Innocentive model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
  • OpenIDEO model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [1]

OSE Narrative

What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.

Learnings

  • 99 Designs - We find that higher financial incentives do not translate to more effort by individual designers, but nonetheless have an impact on the quality outcome of contests by attracting a larger pool of designers - [2]
  • Interesting HeroX challenge - $1M student space rocket challenge. Organized by Base 11. [3]