OSE Enterprise Brainstorming: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*[[L'Atelier Paysan]] - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools. | *[[L'Atelier Paysan]] - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools. | ||
*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies | *[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies | ||
*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results. | *[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results. [https://www.innocentive.com/about-us/] | ||
*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach] | *[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach] | ||
*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure. | *[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure. |
Revision as of 16:33, 20 February 2019
Possible approaches:
- Jams
- Hackathons
- Design Sprints
- Startup Weekend - twist being - we are a distributed team, and teams start enterprises for different locations that are doing the same thing for common production
- Coopetition - like FIRST Robotics
- Meetup
- Incentive Challenge - organize a large number of sponsors interested in a technology, with a promise to produce at low cost via preorders
- Crowd Supply model - helping developers bring products to life. Electronics only.
- Local Motors model - incentive challenges, results not public
- HeroX model - incentive challenge; open to anyone
- FIRST Robotics model - coopetitions - but add purpose to it
- GrabCAD - incentive challenges - designs remain free.
- L'Atelier Paysan - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools.
- China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
- Innocentive model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results. [1]
- OpenIDEO model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [2]
- Idea Connection - [3] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.
OSE Narrative
What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?
Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.
Learnings
- 99 Designs - We find that higher financial incentives do not translate to more effort by individual designers, but nonetheless have an impact on the quality outcome of contests by attracting a larger pool of designers - [4]
- Interesting HeroX challenge - $1M student space rocket challenge. Organized by Base 11. [5]