Extruder Analysis of Industry Standards: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
=Notes=
=Notes=
*Bondtech - https://www.matterhackers.com/store/c/bondtech?rcode=PPCADS&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIjaiS9eGV6QIVT18NCh389w-qEAAYASAAEgIzZfD_BwE
*Bondtech - https://www.matterhackers.com/store/c/bondtech?rcode=PPCADS&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIjaiS9eGV6QIVT18NCh389w-qEAAYASAAEgIzZfD_BwE
*Bondtech appears to be a fundamentally flawed designed from an industrial performance perspective. It can't do rubber. It adds more drive, only to extend the path-to-hotend length via  an [[E3D V6]] style heat sink. That is just Rube Goldberg: lengthen the filament path, so you need stronger filament drive. Don't let me get started.
*Bondtech appears to be a fundamentally flawed designed from an industrial performance perspective. It can't do rubber. It adds more drive, only to extend the path-to-hotend length via  an [[E3D V6]] style heat sink. That is just Rube Goldberg: lengthen the filament path, so you need stronger filament drive. Don't let me get started. It is amazing how expensive, bad design seems to make it far. But I think that will change with the adoption of the [[Universal Gearless]].

Latest revision as of 18:09, 2 May 2020

Extruder Reviews

https://3dprintmanual.com/extruder-hotend-buying-guide/

Notes