CNC Sawmill: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=Working Doc=
=Working Doc=
<html> ________________________________ </html>
<html> <iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vSzAAA--rujCzU5NU4TiflEvgXWslFzp-jHqYWLxfeN4iLNQ6iKMEAbnjdre1_dCq_eJcwbtjJ-jISc/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="480" height="389" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe> </html>


[_______________________________________ edit]
[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1wpyZqICjLLPMD4mcpsz_BrJ-t8xZmd7Or4o4_GkMWoY/edit#slide=id.gb328b2d63d_0_9 edit]


=Options=
=Options=

Revision as of 13:19, 13 June 2021

Working Doc

edit

Options

  • Use a 16" circular saw with 2" universal axis. Advantage: turnkey saw. Dis: small cuts only up to 4 or 6", slow (power only 3 hp)
  • Use long space frame axis for stability, mount on trailer or SMV
  • Use mobile stiff frame on wheels

Industry Standards

  • China wares - [1]
  • Lucas Sawmill - [2] - setup time with wires for stability is a disadvantage. Solid space frame for moving the OSE mill into the field would help. Peterson [3] setup time is no better. But, it can be set up in the field on rough terrain.

Decisions

  • Portable or stationary
  • Rough terrain or not
  • CNC or manual
  • Easy to set up (solid frames) vs not (multi-piece frames with need to align)
  • Hand portable vs heavy, requiring other machines to move it
  • Production (32 hp - 100 hp) vs hobby (7 hp - 27 hp)