Technocracy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Notes: | |||
*Started in 30s at Columbia, revived by Brzezinski at Columbia - teamed up with David Rockefeller. A resource-based economic system. | *Started in 30s at Columbia, revived by Brzezinski at Columbia - teamed up with David Rockefeller. A resource-based economic system. | ||
*Technocracy - only alt to capitalism. Rockefeller hijacked the term, to suck up resources - manage resources. | *Technocracy - only alt to capitalism. Rockefeller hijacked the term, to suck up resources - manage resources. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
*China became a technocracy - scientific method to sociology - not a communist country | *China became a technocracy - scientific method to sociology - not a communist country | ||
*People don't want sustainable development? Global warming? | *People don't want sustainable development? Global warming? | ||
*Without global warming, sustainable dev would go nowhere. | |||
Revision as of 21:08, 20 June 2021
Notes:
- Started in 30s at Columbia, revived by Brzezinski at Columbia - teamed up with David Rockefeller. A resource-based economic system.
- Technocracy - only alt to capitalism. Rockefeller hijacked the term, to suck up resources - manage resources.
- It is the SDGs. Energy is central. Destroy capitalism, replace with sustaiable development.
- What is sustainable development -
- The Hard Road to a New World Order -
- Brzezinski installed trilateral commission work in China? China turned to Technocracy?
- China became a technocracy - scientific method to sociology - not a communist country
- People don't want sustainable development? Global warming?
- Without global warming, sustainable dev would go nowhere.