Open Source Solution to War: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


#Mass mobilization and construction of defensive technology through crowdsourced means - it is an idea but can be problematic.
#Mass mobilization and construction of defensive technology through crowdsourced means - it is an idea but can be problematic.
#Donating military equipment to countries under attack, such as Ukraine 2022.
#Donating military equipment to countries under attack, such as Ukraine 2022. Does this work?
#Sanctions - but for real. Excommunicating offenders from the global community.
#Sanctions - but for real. Excommunicating offenders from the global community.
#Funding paramilitary assistance. But mercenaries are not a pretty thing - see more about the modern mercenary at  [https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/Article/2031922/mercenaries-and-war-understanding-private-armies-today/]
#Funding paramilitary assistance, such as corporate or nonprofit [[Mercenaries]].
#Cyberwarfare
#Cyberwarfare

Latest revision as of 03:49, 25 February 2022

In order of priority:

  1. Prosperity, so that resource conflicts are avoided. Mutually assured abundance.
  2. Education - teaching people how to think, so they are not manipulated. Teach ethics, personal and political transformation as a core in anyone's life.
  3. Elimination of nuclear arms
  4. Open source economy

Potential crisis-point solutions if the above doesn't work:

  1. Mass mobilization and construction of defensive technology through crowdsourced means - it is an idea but can be problematic.
  2. Donating military equipment to countries under attack, such as Ukraine 2022. Does this work?
  3. Sanctions - but for real. Excommunicating offenders from the global community.
  4. Funding paramilitary assistance, such as corporate or nonprofit Mercenaries.
  5. Cyberwarfare