Scanlon Plan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanlon_plan | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanlon_plan | ||
=Orgs= | |||
*Scanlon Leadership Network - [https://www.epic-organizations.com/index.php/scanlon-leaders/scanlonleaders] | |||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
*Early version of Scanlon Plan was not a bonus. | *Early version of Scanlon Plan was not focused on bonus, but on various rewards (innovation, partnership, social) that come from open information sharing. A bonus was included. | ||
*Life Magazine article "Every man a Capitalist" by John Chamberlain, December 1946. | |||
*His work with Lapointe was featured in a Fortune article "Enterprise for Everyman" by John Davenport, January 1950 | |||
*The philosophy of the plan is to promote group co-operation and solving of organizational problems | |||
*He felt that profit sharing as a way to create a bonus was fine as long as everyone understood "profits." He concluded that most don't understand how profits are calculated. | |||
Latest revision as of 16:50, 9 May 2022
http://www.epic-organizations.com/index.php/resources/91-joe-scanlon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanlon_plan
Orgs
- Scanlon Leadership Network - [1]
Notes
- Early version of Scanlon Plan was not focused on bonus, but on various rewards (innovation, partnership, social) that come from open information sharing. A bonus was included.
- Life Magazine article "Every man a Capitalist" by John Chamberlain, December 1946.
- His work with Lapointe was featured in a Fortune article "Enterprise for Everyman" by John Davenport, January 1950
- The philosophy of the plan is to promote group co-operation and solving of organizational problems
- He felt that profit sharing as a way to create a bonus was fine as long as everyone understood "profits." He concluded that most don't understand how profits are calculated.