Seed Eco-Home Ratios: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**Projections - 500 hours with AR assist. It may be that AR assist is required to achieve 500 hr. | **Projections - 500 hours with AR assist. It may be that AR assist is required to achieve 500 hr. | ||
**Each person can build 4 houses in one year according to this model. Under this secenario, net revenue per house must be $16.4k with $32.80 starting pay for graduates. $66k starting. The [[Revenue Model Scanarios]] call for $25k, so AR-assist share generated per builder is $100k. Incentive structure can be set up where an individual captures value under a 50/50 ratio, as soon as they achieve productivity milestones. If it is 4 houses, they get $66k, + 50% of new value created. New value created is half the $34k (excess value above) - so a bonus of $17k, or $83k. It may be interesting to condition this upon risk-share. What if business isn't good? Worker should share both upside and downside - as long as general trend is good pay. The downside is well-mitigated - as model is robust. B | **Each person can build 4 houses in one year according to this model. Under this secenario, net revenue per house must be $16.4k with $32.80 starting pay for graduates. $66k starting. The [[Revenue Model Scanarios]] call for $25k, so AR-assist share generated per builder is $100k. Incentive structure can be set up where an individual captures value under a 50/50 ratio, as soon as they achieve productivity milestones. If it is 4 houses, they get $66k, + 50% of new value created. New value created is half the $34k (excess value above) - so a bonus of $17k, or $83k. It may be interesting to condition this upon risk-share. What if business isn't good? Worker should share both upside and downside - as long as general trend is good pay. The downside is well-mitigated - as model is robust. B | ||
=Land Development= | |||
*Intent - inject life-work and land use integration into any development. Efficiency and profit position OSE exceptionally well in this role, even to the point of adding [[Network State]] integration | |||
*All improvements are shared 50% between the 2 parties involved based on a fair algorithm. | *All improvements are shared 50% between the 2 parties involved based on a fair algorithm. | ||
**Ex - Negotiation of project pay for a whole development - basic 50/50 means: We create a baseline upon what the next competitor would cost. That is our starting pay potential. We divide the benefit of cost reduction 50/50. For example: OSE can do it for $100k. Another guy can do it for $200k (developer still charges their usual profit). Working with OSE 50/50 upside agreement - we charge less than the $200k developer (so that we can get the business). Our starting premise is a lower cost home with ecological features (and potential reinvestment into agrihood enterprise, local waste water, etc), and [[36x]] speed improvement per house. | **Ex - Negotiation of project pay for a whole development - basic 50/50 means: We create a baseline upon what the next competitor would cost. That is our starting pay potential. We divide the benefit of cost reduction 50/50. For example: OSE can do it for $100k. Another guy can do it for $200k (developer still charges their usual profit). Working with OSE 50/50 upside agreement - we charge less than the $200k developer (so that we can get the business). Our starting premise is a lower cost home with ecological features (and potential reinvestment into agrihood enterprise, local waste water, etc), and [[36x]] speed improvement per house. | ||
Revision as of 19:14, 16 October 2022
- Minimum value created from individual effort, accounted per individuals working as a team, or individuals in solitary work - 50% worker revenue, 50% OSE revenue
- 'Revenue' refers to 'net revenue', which is the most important from an enterprise perspective.
- OSE covers training and all operating costs.
- Projections - 500 hours with AR assist. It may be that AR assist is required to achieve 500 hr.
- Each person can build 4 houses in one year according to this model. Under this secenario, net revenue per house must be $16.4k with $32.80 starting pay for graduates. $66k starting. The Revenue Model Scanarios call for $25k, so AR-assist share generated per builder is $100k. Incentive structure can be set up where an individual captures value under a 50/50 ratio, as soon as they achieve productivity milestones. If it is 4 houses, they get $66k, + 50% of new value created. New value created is half the $34k (excess value above) - so a bonus of $17k, or $83k. It may be interesting to condition this upon risk-share. What if business isn't good? Worker should share both upside and downside - as long as general trend is good pay. The downside is well-mitigated - as model is robust. B
Land Development
- Intent - inject life-work and land use integration into any development. Efficiency and profit position OSE exceptionally well in this role, even to the point of adding Network State integration
- All improvements are shared 50% between the 2 parties involved based on a fair algorithm.
- Ex - Negotiation of project pay for a whole development - basic 50/50 means: We create a baseline upon what the next competitor would cost. That is our starting pay potential. We divide the benefit of cost reduction 50/50. For example: OSE can do it for $100k. Another guy can do it for $200k (developer still charges their usual profit). Working with OSE 50/50 upside agreement - we charge less than the $200k developer (so that we can get the business). Our starting premise is a lower cost home with ecological features (and potential reinvestment into agrihood enterprise, local waste water, etc), and 36x speed improvement per house.