Seed Eco-Home Ratios: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=About Fairness=
How to avoid niggling in negotiation, by keeping principles fair and simple such as 50/50 revenue share?
=More=
*Minimum value created from individual effort, accounted per individuals working as a team, or individuals in solitary work - 50% worker revenue, 50% OSE revenue
*Minimum value created from individual effort, accounted per individuals working as a team, or individuals in solitary work - 50% worker revenue, 50% OSE revenue
**'Revenue' refers to 'net revenue', which is the most important from an enterprise perspective.
**'Revenue' refers to 'net revenue', which is the most important from an enterprise perspective.
Line 4: Line 8:
**Projections - 500 hours with AR assist. It may be that AR assist is required to achieve 500 hr.
**Projections - 500 hours with AR assist. It may be that AR assist is required to achieve 500 hr.
**Each person can build 4 houses in one year according to this model. Under this secenario, net revenue per house must be $16.4k with $32.80 starting pay for graduates. $66k starting. The [[Revenue Model Scanarios]] call for $25k, so AR-assist share generated per builder is $100k. Incentive structure can be set up where an individual captures value under a 50/50 ratio, as soon as they achieve productivity milestones. If it is 4 houses, they get $66k, + 50% of new value created. New value created is half the $34k (excess value above) - so a bonus of $17k, or $83k. It may be interesting to condition this upon risk-share. What if business isn't good? Worker should share both upside and downside - as long as general trend is good pay. The downside is well-mitigated - as model is robust. B   
**Each person can build 4 houses in one year according to this model. Under this secenario, net revenue per house must be $16.4k with $32.80 starting pay for graduates. $66k starting. The [[Revenue Model Scanarios]] call for $25k, so AR-assist share generated per builder is $100k. Incentive structure can be set up where an individual captures value under a 50/50 ratio, as soon as they achieve productivity milestones. If it is 4 houses, they get $66k, + 50% of new value created. New value created is half the $34k (excess value above) - so a bonus of $17k, or $83k. It may be interesting to condition this upon risk-share. What if business isn't good? Worker should share both upside and downside - as long as general trend is good pay. The downside is well-mitigated - as model is robust. B   
*All improvements are shared 50% between the 2 parties involved based on a fair algorithm.
 
**Ex - Negotiation of project pay for a whole development - basic 50/50 means: We create a baseline upon what the next competitor would cost. That is our starting pay potential. We divide the benefit of cost reduction 50/50. For example: OSE can do it for $100k. Another guy can do it for $200k (developer still charges their usual profit). Working with OSE 50/50 upside agreement - we charge less than the $200k developer (so that we can get the business). Our starting premise is a lower cost home with ecological features.
=Land Development=
 
See [[New Jersey Project]]
 
=Links=

Latest revision as of 16:30, 17 October 2022

About Fairness

How to avoid niggling in negotiation, by keeping principles fair and simple such as 50/50 revenue share?

More

  • Minimum value created from individual effort, accounted per individuals working as a team, or individuals in solitary work - 50% worker revenue, 50% OSE revenue
    • 'Revenue' refers to 'net revenue', which is the most important from an enterprise perspective.
    • OSE covers training and all operating costs.
    • Projections - 500 hours with AR assist. It may be that AR assist is required to achieve 500 hr.
    • Each person can build 4 houses in one year according to this model. Under this secenario, net revenue per house must be $16.4k with $32.80 starting pay for graduates. $66k starting. The Revenue Model Scanarios call for $25k, so AR-assist share generated per builder is $100k. Incentive structure can be set up where an individual captures value under a 50/50 ratio, as soon as they achieve productivity milestones. If it is 4 houses, they get $66k, + 50% of new value created. New value created is half the $34k (excess value above) - so a bonus of $17k, or $83k. It may be interesting to condition this upon risk-share. What if business isn't good? Worker should share both upside and downside - as long as general trend is good pay. The downside is well-mitigated - as model is robust. B

Land Development

See New Jersey Project

Links

Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Seed_Eco-Home_Ratios&oldid=276979"