Hedgehog Concept: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=4/27/23=
==Definition of Success==
*Steve - definition of success
*Prove the model
*What is the model
*Model was the economic reason to believe
**Financial independence
**Can be fast, so we can prove
*Milestone - i think we will make $ on first home. Failure is home deoesn't work. Fail is $200k sale, $300 cost. Fail to prove the model.
*Milestones - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
*Prove: here it is. Here is the time.
==Hedgehog Concept==
*'''Collaborative open enterprise culture for for an inclusive economy of abundance'''
*'Solving pressing world issues' - can paralyze rather than inspire.
*Vision is what we want to become.
*Hedgehog is what we do, be best at
*Pressing world issues - different opinions on what that is
*Uniting around something big like this -
*Open collaborative enterprise culture
*Ex - oceans for all for ever.
*Vision - who we want to be. Can sustain many mission statements.
*Mission - where we are going. We want to be like this so we can get to there. Hedgehog is more mission.
*Collaborative open enterprise culture for access everywhere
*Collaborative open enterprise culture for (everyone as in inclusive) for an (economy of abundance)
*for an inclusive economy of abundance.
*Home breakthroughs:
**Disrupts trades
**Cost
**For sure not the rich
**Applicable Business purposes
**Applicable to DiY purposes
*Strategy builds around vision.
=4/23/23=
=4/23/23=
*Building collaborative, open enterprise ecosystems and communities for everyone.
*Building collaborative, open enterprise ecosystems and communities for everyone.

Latest revision as of 21:02, 27 April 2023

4/23/23

  • Building collaborative, open enterprise ecosystems and communities for everyone.

4/22/23

  • Transparent, modular system design culture for distributing optimal, ethical enterprise.
    • End point is ethical, integrated, ecosystems. As opposed to siloed, disconnnected.
  • Transformation through transparent system design.
    • Implies the integration
  • Open, modular production for solving pressing world issues.
    • Not collaborative? Is collaboration a part if collaboration is not a good selling point? How are we inclusive without collaboration?
  • Modular design-build enterprise systems for solving pressing world issues.
  • Open collaborative enterprise culture for evolving to possibility.
    • Open collaborative replicable enterprise culture for evolving on pressing world issues by design-build.
      • True that most people don't care about saving the world, but our team aspires to this as the point of differentiation
      • Includes open/collaborative core, but not methods such as modularity, swarms, optimization
      • Shows clear discipline through 'culture' - which must have discipline of people, thought, and action
      • Solving pressing world issues must be meant to convey discipline
      • Core message must center on discipline and performance culture, and aspiration of growth and evolution
  • Open collaborative enterprise culture for evolving to possibility.
  • Distributive enterprise for financial independence.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Hedgehog_Concept&oldid=282385"