OSE Tactics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An expression of OSE values. | |||
*'''Open source flywheels''' - based on [[Good to Great]], product-specific tactical information (CAD-BOM-Build) for replicable enterprise. | *'''Open source flywheels''' - based on [[Good to Great]], product-specific tactical information (CAD-BOM-Build) for replicable enterprise. | ||
*'''Breaking the Iron Triangle''' - we allow for DIY and pro, thus allowing swarms for speed or lower entry barriers for apprentices. Cost is kept down by efficiency and design. We source lowest cost to customer, not convenience to builder. We source big box stores as much as possible (COTS), not COTS+ which requires shipping more specialized parts, and we never do non-COTS in production unless we build the part in house. We go for quality by design: simplicity, modularity, and robustification. All for lifetime design. | *'''Breaking the Iron Triangle''' - we allow for DIY and pro, thus allowing swarms for speed or lower entry barriers for apprentices. Cost is kept down by efficiency and design. We source lowest cost to customer, not convenience to builder. We source big box stores as much as possible (COTS), not COTS+ which requires shipping more specialized parts, and we never do non-COTS in production unless we build the part in house. We go for quality by design: simplicity, modularity, and robustification. All for lifetime design. | ||
*'''Second Toyota Paradox''' - excessive prototyping to succeed at scale faster. Paradox because integration happens late in the game, so it looks like product will be late, but it will actually be better and faster to market success. | |||
Revision as of 23:41, 10 May 2023
An expression of OSE values.
- Open source flywheels - based on Good to Great, product-specific tactical information (CAD-BOM-Build) for replicable enterprise.
- Breaking the Iron Triangle - we allow for DIY and pro, thus allowing swarms for speed or lower entry barriers for apprentices. Cost is kept down by efficiency and design. We source lowest cost to customer, not convenience to builder. We source big box stores as much as possible (COTS), not COTS+ which requires shipping more specialized parts, and we never do non-COTS in production unless we build the part in house. We go for quality by design: simplicity, modularity, and robustification. All for lifetime design.
- Second Toyota Paradox - excessive prototyping to succeed at scale faster. Paradox because integration happens late in the game, so it looks like product will be late, but it will actually be better and faster to market success.