Recruiting 100 People in 60 Days: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
| m (Marcin moved page Recruiting 100 People in 180 Days to Recruiting 100 People in 60 Days) | |||
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| =About= | |||
| https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-strategy/how-recruiting-team-made-100-hires-in-60-days | https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-strategy/how-recruiting-team-made-100-hires-in-60-days | ||
| Notes for this specific example: | Notes on keys to success for this specific example: | ||
| # | #Candidates skipped an interview step if scored well on initial screen   | ||
| #2 different start dates (Dec + Jan) to simplify onboarding | #2 different start dates (Dec + Jan) to simplify onboarding | ||
| #2 week training | #2 week training | ||
| #5% acceptance rate | |||
| #From actual interviews, we got 25% acceptance. | |||
| [[File:recstatslinkedin.jpeg|200px]] | |||
| #A figure of 5-10 hour per week recruiting commitment was mentioned. Assume this was the majority - then 7.5 hr * 40 people * 8 weeks = 2400 hours of recruiting time for 100 people - 24 hours per person? Way too much. Initial screen of 2100. Assume initial screen was a few minutes per: 2100*5 min=170 hrs. 40 interviews at 30 min - 20 hrs. That is about 200 hours so far. | |||
| =More Success Notes= | |||
| *This is information work, so work from anywhere is possible. Relevance to OSE - can do remote production option. | |||
| *Clear guidelines - for who they want | |||
| *Recruiting team - several weeks, 5-10 hrs per week with a team. | |||
| *Qaulifications->2100 candidates->100 hires - 1/21 acceptance. | |||
| **High score on initial screen sent candidate directly to onsite interview with hiring manager | |||
| **Mid score people got second interview, and a batch interview process on site: 40 candidates interviewed in one week. Batch session was 4-30 minute interview with role play as customer. | |||
| =OSE Extrapolation= | |||
| *To hire 12 builders, first 4 in the first month, then 8 more as soon as cash flow is proven. Note initial hiccups with legal as we work out the builds. | |||
| *Screen down to 50 candidates from initial screening application (4 screened candidates per position). Accept 12 excellent candidates. Save names for later as we grow: if we have more successful ones, we simply offer later starting dates. | |||
Latest revision as of 20:31, 28 May 2023
About
Notes on keys to success for this specific example:
- Candidates skipped an interview step if scored well on initial screen
- 2 different start dates (Dec + Jan) to simplify onboarding
- 2 week training
- 5% acceptance rate
- From actual interviews, we got 25% acceptance.
- A figure of 5-10 hour per week recruiting commitment was mentioned. Assume this was the majority - then 7.5 hr * 40 people * 8 weeks = 2400 hours of recruiting time for 100 people - 24 hours per person? Way too much. Initial screen of 2100. Assume initial screen was a few minutes per: 2100*5 min=170 hrs. 40 interviews at 30 min - 20 hrs. That is about 200 hours so far.
More Success Notes
- This is information work, so work from anywhere is possible. Relevance to OSE - can do remote production option.
- Clear guidelines - for who they want
- Recruiting team - several weeks, 5-10 hrs per week with a team.
- Qaulifications->2100 candidates->100 hires - 1/21 acceptance.
- High score on initial screen sent candidate directly to onsite interview with hiring manager
- Mid score people got second interview, and a batch interview process on site: 40 candidates interviewed in one week. Batch session was 4-30 minute interview with role play as customer.
 
OSE Extrapolation
- To hire 12 builders, first 4 in the first month, then 8 more as soon as cash flow is proven. Note initial hiccups with legal as we work out the builds.
- Screen down to 50 candidates from initial screening application (4 screened candidates per position). Accept 12 excellent candidates. Save names for later as we grow: if we have more successful ones, we simply offer later starting dates.
