OSE Method: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*We ask what is best in the world *We start by saying some of our design is best in the world, best in class. Then we define what 'best in the world' means by attributes. *We...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*We ask what is best in the world | *We ask what is best in the world | ||
*We | *We continue with a claim that some of our design is best in the world, best in class. Then we define what 'best in the world' means by attributes. | ||
*We don't claim we have it already. But we explain closely how the 'best in the world' is highly achievable by collaboration. | |||
**Explain the industry standard | |||
**Explain the industry intertia | |||
**And explain the requirements for breakthrough | |||
*We explain how 'best in the world' is highly replicable, and therefore inclusive | *We explain how 'best in the world' is highly replicable, and therefore inclusive | ||
*Then we present the public with a choice - with the positive psychology of 'do you want to be good or do you want to be great?' A la good is the enemy of great. | *Then we present the public with a choice - with the positive psychology of 'do you want to be good or do you want to be great?' A la good is the enemy of great. | ||
Revision as of 20:18, 6 December 2023
- We ask what is best in the world
- We continue with a claim that some of our design is best in the world, best in class. Then we define what 'best in the world' means by attributes.
- We don't claim we have it already. But we explain closely how the 'best in the world' is highly achievable by collaboration.
- Explain the industry standard
- Explain the industry intertia
- And explain the requirements for breakthrough
- We explain how 'best in the world' is highly replicable, and therefore inclusive
- Then we present the public with a choice - with the positive psychology of 'do you want to be good or do you want to be great?' A la good is the enemy of great.