Sharkbite Fittings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Notes) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=vBOM= | |||
See [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ahs02Qxyprzoiu1zv76kwfKg78MSKjO6be-TdyM1r-U/edit?slide=id.g26b4621acc5_1_0#slide=id.g26b4621acc5_1_0] | |||
=Pros and Cons= | =Pros and Cons= | ||
Latest revision as of 10:26, 8 December 2025
vBOM
See [1]
Pros and Cons
Pretty good overview:
Negative View - But Conclusion is That they Work Well
In the video above - this plumber explains why he doesn't use them - citing higher potential for leaks:
Video comments:
- One Australian plumber says everyone uses them in Australia and if they don't, their work costs too much and thus they are not competitive.
- Comments also say 'The bottom line is that the independent testing has said "Sharkbites work, they work well, and they are no more likely to leak than other fittings!"'
- 'This sounds like plumbers talking bad on sharkbite because it makes plumbers obsolete...Quickest and easiest way to connect. I know it sucks when your trade is being undercut by an invention but don't be that guy.'
Internet Comments
- Push-fit leak more - [2]
- Stay away from push-fit, but clear reason is not given [3]
- Reliable but soldering is better [4]
- Sharkbite says PEX lasts longer than copper [5]
- M type copper lasts 20, L type lasts 50, and K type lasts 100 [6]
- PEX will likely last as long as copper. [7]