CNC Sawmill: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
*But - second route still requires a custom touchscreen with its own MCU, not the standard screens from Marlin - so the [[Degeneracy]] criterion fails.
*But - second route still requires a custom touchscreen with its own MCU, not the standard screens from Marlin - so the [[Degeneracy]] criterion fails.
*{{check}}{{check}}thus, just modify Marlin, and while not designed for industrial cnc, if we reprogram Marlin, we make it as effective as GRBL/LinuxCNC if we pay attention to programming in added functionality. [https://chatgpt.com/share/694dee2a-7a80-8010-ad4b-862460f5c3af]. The open source revolution is nigh.
*{{check}}{{check}}thus, just modify Marlin, and while not designed for industrial cnc, if we reprogram Marlin, we make it as effective as GRBL/LinuxCNC if we pay attention to programming in added functionality. [https://chatgpt.com/share/694dee2a-7a80-8010-ad4b-862460f5c3af]. The open source revolution is nigh.
**For future proof industrial grade, go to 32 bit controller like Due, which is not more expensive [https://chatgpt.com/share/694dee2a-7a80-8010-ad4b-862460f5c3af]


=Working Doc=
=Working Doc=

Revision as of 03:56, 26 December 2025

Concept

  • Integrate Marlin/RAMPS/Touchscreen since we already use it - with larger stepper motors as chain axis drive for the sawmill - [1]
  • Check.pngSure, but use a more dedicated GRBL/RAMPS with touchscreen. [2]. Can be productized.
  • But - second route still requires a custom touchscreen with its own MCU, not the standard screens from Marlin - so the Degeneracy criterion fails.
  • Check.pngCheck.pngthus, just modify Marlin, and while not designed for industrial cnc, if we reprogram Marlin, we make it as effective as GRBL/LinuxCNC if we pay attention to programming in added functionality. [3]. The open source revolution is nigh.
    • For future proof industrial grade, go to 32 bit controller like Due, which is not more expensive [4]

Working Doc

edit

Part Library

Part Library

Visual History:


12footrebartruss.pngAssemblywithrails2.pngAssemblywithrails.png3foottruss2.png3foottruss.pngRails.pngSawmillframeassy2.pngSawmillframeassy.pngSmalltruss.pngCncsaw3.pngCncsaw2.pngCncsaw.png


Options

  • Use a 16" circular saw with 2" universal axis. Advantage: turnkey saw. Dis: small cuts only up to 4 or 6", slow (power only 3 hp)
  • Use long space frame axis for stability, mount on trailer or SMV
  • Use mobile stiff frame on wheels

Industry Standards

  • China wares - [5]
  • Lucas Sawmill - [6] - setup time with wires for stability is a disadvantage. Solid space frame for moving the OSE mill into the field would help. Peterson [7] setup time is no better. But, it can be set up in the field on rough terrain.

Decisions

  • Portable or stationary
  • Rough terrain or not
  • CNC or manual
  • Easy to set up (solid frames) vs not (multi-piece frames with need to align)
  • Hand portable vs heavy, requiring other machines to move it
  • Production (32 hp - 100 hp) vs hobby (7 hp - 27 hp)