Hedgehog Concept: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=4/27/23=
=About=
*Vision is what we want to become.
 
*Hedgehog is what we do, be best at
The Hedgehog Concept, developed by Jim Collins in Good to Great, is a strategic framework for achieving superior, long-term success by focusing on one, simple, "crystalline" idea. What are you best in the world at?
*Pressing world issues - different opinions on what that is
 
*Uniting around something big like this -
 
*Open collaborative enterprise culture
=OSE Context=
*Ex - oceans for all for ever.
 
*Vision - who we want to be. Can sustain many mission statements.
For OSE, that means every person should be able to answer five questions:
*Mission - where we are going. We want to be like this so we can get to there.
 
*Collaborative open enterprise culture for access everywhere
#What are we building?
*Collaborative open enterprise culture for inclusive
#Why does it matter?
#How does it create revenue or livelihood?
#How does it become replicable?
#How does my role improve that system?


=4/23/23=
=4/23/23=

Latest revision as of 10:14, 6 April 2026

About

The Hedgehog Concept, developed by Jim Collins in Good to Great, is a strategic framework for achieving superior, long-term success by focusing on one, simple, "crystalline" idea. What are you best in the world at?


OSE Context

For OSE, that means every person should be able to answer five questions:

  1. What are we building?
  2. Why does it matter?
  3. How does it create revenue or livelihood?
  4. How does it become replicable?
  5. How does my role improve that system?

4/23/23

  • Building collaborative, open enterprise ecosystems and communities for everyone.

4/22/23

  • Transparent, modular system design culture for distributing optimal, ethical enterprise.
    • End point is ethical, integrated, ecosystems. As opposed to siloed, disconnnected.
  • Transformation through transparent system design.
    • Implies the integration
  • Open, modular production for solving pressing world issues.
    • Not collaborative? Is collaboration a part if collaboration is not a good selling point? How are we inclusive without collaboration?
  • Modular design-build enterprise systems for solving pressing world issues.
  • Open collaborative enterprise culture for evolving to possibility.
    • Open collaborative replicable enterprise culture for evolving on pressing world issues by design-build.
      • True that most people don't care about saving the world, but our team aspires to this as the point of differentiation
      • Includes open/collaborative core, but not methods such as modularity, swarms, optimization
      • Shows clear discipline through 'culture' - which must have discipline of people, thought, and action
      • Solving pressing world issues must be meant to convey discipline
      • Core message must center on discipline and performance culture, and aspiration of growth and evolution
  • Open collaborative enterprise culture for evolving to possibility.
  • Distributive enterprise for financial independence.