Talk:Biochar Crusher: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Rasmus, Thanks for the wiki contributions. Can you add some info on pelletized biochar? Our proposed route is continuous charcoal production on a desktop scale by making pel...")
 
(Added some thoughts/ideas of mine)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Rasmus,
Rasmus,


Thanks for the wiki contributions. Can you add some info on pelletized biochar?
Thanks for the wiki contributions. Can you add some info on [[Pelletized Biochar]] ?


Our proposed route is continuous charcoal production on a desktop scale by making pellets first, then using them in hydronic stoves to generate heat while producing charcoal in a continuous process. This has great potential for wide adoption because the plant size is reduced significantly, and we'd like to prototype a desktop bioachar maker this year, such that it's a practical part of any home.
Our proposed route is continuous charcoal production on a desktop scale by making pellets first, then using them in hydronic stoves to generate heat while producing charcoal in a continuous process. This has great potential for wide adoption because the plant size is reduced significantly, and we'd like to prototype a desktop bioachar maker this year, such that it's a practical part of any home.


MJ
MJ
____________
*On the note of to crush or not to crush, i think it depends on what the goal is:
**If your goal is [[Carbon Sequestration]] / [[Fill]] probably not (Although if compacting it a ton, a fine powder may sink less?)
**If your goal is for it to be mixed into the soil well and upgrade that soil to [[SABE]] ( [[Terra Preta]] ) a fine powder is probably best
*GRANTED citation needed
*In terms of knowns:
**"How Permanent is Pyrogenic Carbon in a Live Soil" is one of the big concerns in [[Biochar as a Means of Carbon Sequestration]] , uncertain on the current state of the art on that
**Surface Area is your Friend*
***Only unknow of this is what role coarse debris/rocks would play in a Soil
***Might help stabilize soil/prevent erosion, also do larger chunks hold onto water better?
***The ORIGINAL [[Amazonian Black Earth]] Soils also had [[Terra Cotta]] / [[Pottery Sherds]] so that may be a relevant piece of the puzzle, not powderized charcoal
*Ways to go about it all:
**Pre-Grinding of Waste via a [[In-Sink Wet Waste Grinder]]
**Post-Grinding in a Yard Waste Grinder / Consumer Level [[Electric Woodchipper]] (Coarser Grind, but low complexity+maintainance concerns)
**Post-Grinding via a [[Hammermill]] (Especially with higher [[Air Classifier]] integrated models can produce a very fine, consistent mix.  Bit of a maintenance / [[Combustible Dust Explosion]] + [[Fugitive Dust Emissions]] concern
***Also unlike other methods could probably NOT handle Wet Charcoal well due to clumping/clogging concerns
**Post-Grinding in a [[Ball Mill]]
***Would probably have to be in a Batch Configuration, and is LOUD, but could be done with Wet Charcoal and get to any desired Particle Size
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 22:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:53, 12 October 2025

Rasmus,

Thanks for the wiki contributions. Can you add some info on Pelletized Biochar ?

Our proposed route is continuous charcoal production on a desktop scale by making pellets first, then using them in hydronic stoves to generate heat while producing charcoal in a continuous process. This has great potential for wide adoption because the plant size is reduced significantly, and we'd like to prototype a desktop bioachar maker this year, such that it's a practical part of any home.

MJ

____________

  • On the note of to crush or not to crush, i think it depends on what the goal is:
    • If your goal is Carbon Sequestration / Fill probably not (Although if compacting it a ton, a fine powder may sink less?)
    • If your goal is for it to be mixed into the soil well and upgrade that soil to SABE ( Terra Preta ) a fine powder is probably best
  • GRANTED citation needed
  • In terms of knowns:
    • "How Permanent is Pyrogenic Carbon in a Live Soil" is one of the big concerns in Biochar as a Means of Carbon Sequestration , uncertain on the current state of the art on that
    • Surface Area is your Friend*
      • Only unknow of this is what role coarse debris/rocks would play in a Soil
      • Might help stabilize soil/prevent erosion, also do larger chunks hold onto water better?
      • The ORIGINAL Amazonian Black Earth Soils also had Terra Cotta / Pottery Sherds so that may be a relevant piece of the puzzle, not powderized charcoal
  • Ways to go about it all:
    • Pre-Grinding of Waste via a In-Sink Wet Waste Grinder
    • Post-Grinding in a Yard Waste Grinder / Consumer Level Electric Woodchipper (Coarser Grind, but low complexity+maintainance concerns)
    • Post-Grinding via a Hammermill (Especially with higher Air Classifier integrated models can produce a very fine, consistent mix. Bit of a maintenance / Combustible Dust Explosion + Fugitive Dust Emissions concern
      • Also unlike other methods could probably NOT handle Wet Charcoal well due to clumping/clogging concerns
    • Post-Grinding in a Ball Mill
      • Would probably have to be in a Batch Configuration, and is LOUD, but could be done with Wet Charcoal and get to any desired Particle Size

--Eric (talk) 22:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)