Biological Innovation for Open Society: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "https://www.wired.com/2005/01/open-source-biology-evolves/ Good point on bad use: "Jefferson, however, distinguishes between having access to biotech components and the lega...") |
(Added some more links) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"Jefferson, however, distinguishes between having access to biotech components and the legal license to use them. The techniques for biohacking are already public – they can be found in IP contracts – it's just not legal to apply them. "The people who have malice are going to do it irrespective of whether or not it's legal," said Jefferson. | "Jefferson, however, distinguishes between having access to biotech components and the legal license to use them. The techniques for biohacking are already public – they can be found in IP contracts – it's just not legal to apply them. "The people who have malice are going to do it irrespective of whether or not it's legal," said Jefferson. | ||
=See Also= | |||
*[[Open Source Laboratory Construction Set]] | |||
*[http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Construction_Sets#Lab_Stuff Part of the "Construction Sets" Page With Other Lab Related Stuff] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:19, 11 May 2018
https://www.wired.com/2005/01/open-source-biology-evolves/
Good point on bad use:
"Jefferson, however, distinguishes between having access to biotech components and the legal license to use them. The techniques for biohacking are already public – they can be found in IP contracts – it's just not legal to apply them. "The people who have malice are going to do it irrespective of whether or not it's legal," said Jefferson.