Talk:D3D v18.06.12: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added some thoughts) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
On the note of the metric system, I was thinking on transfering/translating more stuff to that. Some things might convert nicely, but others would require users to make them into "nicer" numbers. Definetly would be a nice change for international adoption. | On the note of the metric system, I was thinking on transfering/translating more stuff to that. Some things might convert nicely, but others would require users to make them into "nicer" numbers. Definetly would be a nice change for international adoption. | ||
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 21:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
--[[User: | This would be great. Internationalization and modern standards are important parts of the global OSE movement. One day I will mention it again during the dev meeting :). | ||
I understand that for some historical reasons we can still call 1" pipe a 1" pipe but it is better to use modern system for modern technology. | |||
--[[User:Ruslan|Ruslan]] ([[User talk:Ruslan|talk]]) 21:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 24 June 2018
On the note of the metric system, I was thinking on transfering/translating more stuff to that. Some things might convert nicely, but others would require users to make them into "nicer" numbers. Definetly would be a nice change for international adoption.
--Eric (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
This would be great. Internationalization and modern standards are important parts of the global OSE movement. One day I will mention it again during the dev meeting :). I understand that for some historical reasons we can still call 1" pipe a 1" pipe but it is better to use modern system for modern technology. --Ruslan (talk) 21:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)