Compressed Air Energy Storage Calculations: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
 (→About)  | 
				 (→About)  | 
				||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**This could be true if compressor efficiency is 60% and tool efficiency is 20-30% for standard air tools.  | **This could be true if compressor efficiency is 60% and tool efficiency is 20-30% for standard air tools.  | ||
*7-8 hp input to compressor yields 1 hp at the air tool shaft. [https://fluidpowerjournal.com/air-tool-is-inefficient/]  | *7-8 hp input to compressor yields 1 hp at the air tool shaft. [https://fluidpowerjournal.com/air-tool-is-inefficient/]  | ||
[[File:compressedair.jpg|400px]]  | |||
Losses:  | |||
[[File:compressedairlosses.jpg|400px]]  | |||
=Calculations=  | =Calculations=  | ||
Latest revision as of 20:01, 19 May 2025
Compressed air energy storage or gravity water storage costs 10x less than any other based on 100 year vs 10 year lifetime of the system.
About
- 'Only 10% to 20% of the energy required to generate compressed air ever reaches the point of use' - [1]
- This could be true if compressor efficiency is 60% and tool efficiency is 20-30% for standard air tools.
 
 - 7-8 hp input to compressor yields 1 hp at the air tool shaft. [2]
 
Losses:
Calculations
- Work to compress, thus energy stored in isothermal conditions - is W = P1V1 * ln(P2/P1) [3]
 - Adiabatic compression - [W = P1V1 - P2V2 / (1 - γ)] [4]
 - Let's take industrial gas cylinders with K, T, 3K, 6K standards - 300 cu ft for T [5]. 2200-2600 psi is the standard, but also 3000 PSI and 6000 PSI.
 - T type - 300 cf
 
Other
- 150 PSI, 660 gal receiver tank - $3500 [6]
 
Links
Full treatment at Compressed Air Calculations