Future Builders Enterprise Track

Jan 17, 2026

• Start with 10 day Future Builders Crash Course - build a complete house
• Practice skills in RLF.
• Build the modules.
• Document them in the RLF.
• Rinse and repeat.
• Deploy to a real worksite.
• Finish a complete house.
• Document throughout.

Basic structure of 6 months - [1]

What extra curriculum do we need? 85% above rinse and repeat - 10-15% enrichment of which 1/3 is core and 2/3 is optional, borrowing from the designer track. [2]

FBET trains builders to start businesses that sell standardized construction modules to OSE, creating a production-driven flywheel that funds housing, training, and open-source development.

Product Ecology

Population Segmentation (This Is Critical)

Population Segment	Primary Motivation / What They Want	Best-Fit Pathway in the OSE Ecology
Hardcore builders	Fast income, real skills, business ownership	FBET (production immersion → module competency → vendor business)
Serious engineers	Real hardware R&D with tangible deliverables	GVCS R&D Sprints (time-bounded, artifact-bounded, benchmarked)
Idealists / impact-seekers	Meaning, contribution, participation in something historic	Extreme Design/Build Events (high-energy, time-bounded, public outputs)
Remote contributors	Flexible participation, asynchronous contribution, portfolio artifacts	Online Collaboration (docs, CAD, QA, issue triage, reviews)
Entrepreneurs	Market access, repeatable products, scalable operations	FBET + Production Contracts (module supply, on-site builds, scaling into adjacent products)

Hard Truth

If FBET fails to produce profitable builders quickly:

• No amount of vision will save GVCS
• No R&D track will sustain itself
• No 1000 people will stay

You are right to anchor everything to time-to-revenue and ownership.

Scaling and Need for Governance

• 3 person microoperations yield a house per month or two.
• Model here is even better than the Core Enterprise Model - as labor is derisked via partnership and business ownership.
• So next we need to move to the governance that must survive until $50B, the next few years [3]

OSE Core Authority (Non-Negotiable)

Source [4]

OSE Core holds exclusive custodial authority over the following system-critical domains:

• Canonical product definitions — what constitutes an official OSE product (e.g., “the house”)
• Interface standards — what must connect to what, and how
• Acceptance criteria — what counts as “done” and deliverable
• Benchmark metrics — what is measured, tracked, and publicly published
• Official documentation canon — the authoritative source of truth for designs and processes
• Brand usage — what may be represented as OSE-compliant or OSE-delivered
• Contract templates — standard commercial and execution agreements
• Warranty boundary definitions — what OSE does and does not warrant
• GVCS roadmap prioritization — sequencing and focus of open-sector development

This authority is not democratic.

It is custodial authority, exercised in trust for the open sector to preserve system coherence, interoperability, and long-term non-capture.

Crews and vendors do not vote on standards.

They execute against them under contract, or fork the system and operate independently outside OSE brand, contracts, and warranties.

OSE needs strict artifact-based governance well before $50B to prevent fragmentation during success; civilization-scale governance only becomes relevant after the technosphere is materially open and self-auditing.

See OSE Governance

Jan 15, 2026

https://chatgpt.com/share/696479c8-2c14-8010-9f8f-5ecff7304320

edit

or

File:Futurebuildersenterprisetrack.pdf