|
|
| (37 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{GVCS Header}} | | {{GVCS Header}} |
|
| |
|
| =Overview=
| | '''All Torch Table research and development should be documented here on this page. The project team is being organized on https://scrumy.com/torchtable''' |
| {{Torch Table}}
| |
|
| |
|
| *[http://openfarmtech.org/weblog/?p=1424 Torch Table Blog Post]
| | =Prototype 1= |
| *[[Torch Table Concept]]
| | ==CNC Torch Table Prototype I== |
| *[[Plasma Cutter Design]]
| | [[CNC Torch Table 1]] |
| *[[G-code]]
| |
| *[[Torch Table Motors]]
| |
| *[[LinuxCNC]]
| |
|
| |
|
| =Work piece table= | | ==lessons learned and methods used== |
| I designed a modular table that could be used by itself or strapped together to make a larger table. I also designed a method to use bricks as the under surface to protect the metal the table is made from getting cut by the plasma cutter.
| | * section reserved for those who worked on the first prototype. |
|
| |
|
| To accomplish this feat I chose a space frame structure made up of eight 2.5' by 2.5' by 1' cubes. They used 11 gauge 1.5" diameter square tubes and used 26 inches of tube. Some material is lost due to cutting and the exact dimensions aren't as important because the height will be adjustable with bolts on the feet.
| | ==documents== |
| | * add links to any cad files pdfs or images of the first torch table here. |
|
| |
|
| [[File:Space frame lengths drilled.JPG|400px]]
| | ==other info== |
| [[File:Space frame pieces 2.JPG|400px]]
| | * add any other links to documents videos or blog entries about prototype 1 here. |
| [[ File:More space frame goodness 3.JPG |400px]]
| |
| [[File:How the joints look on space frame.JPG |400px]]
| |
| [[File:Another picture of space frame joint, less fuzzy.JPG |400px]]
| |
| [[File:Space frame and bricks in all their glory.JPG | 400px]]
| |
|
| |
|
| The bricks are held in place by placing 2.5 foot long angle beams across the top of the square such that a brick can be placed so the sides of the brick rest on the walls of the angle beam, not on the apex. The weight of the brick keep the angle beams in place and the angle beams rest against the inside of the space frame to keep the bricks from pushing the angle beams apart and slipping through.
| | =See Also= |
| | | *[[CNC_Torch_Table/Research_Development/Previous_Version]] |
| Another neat aspect of this idea is that there are several ways to adjust the height of the table. One method is to raise and lower the bolts, but this will only net you an inch or more of precise motion. The other option is to rearrange the brick pattern such that they stand taller lenghwise, this uses more bricks but also makes the table taller by several inches without doing something you might be doing anyways like switching the bricks over to a less burnt section. It is still unknown how good a work surface bricks actually are. It is hoped that they will be sufficient as they are a bountiful resource at FeF.
| | *The latest research for version 2 of the Torch Table [[CNC_Torch_Table_2/Research_Development]] |
| | |
| =Review= | |
| | |
| Please submit comments here. Please review our design rationale first.
| |
| | |
| Particular points:
| |
| *Suitability of 3x1/8" cold rolled rail as a guide
| |
| *Suitability of thin gauge 1" square tubing for most of the gantry
| |
| *Structural or stability issues?
| |
| *Acceleration issues?
| |
| *Feasibility of using a laptop and compromises therefrom?
| |
| **run [[http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Latency-Test realtime latency test]] before getting too attached - laptops are notorious for hardware timing glitches. | |
| ***Lawrence: Performed, just not documented. We were getting in the 30-50 micro seconds range which is acceptable for right now. We have several other computers but the laptop was the only one that didn't have an immediate hardware issue.
| |
| **dust generated by plasma will get in keyboard and fan, wear out quickly. hard to replace laptop parts. | |
| ***Lawrence: Good catch. this is especially relevant since the recommended parallel cable length is 3 feet to 6 feet and the motor controller box itself has rather shortish cables. The ideal solution is to use something that is more robust and able to be isolated like an embedded processor in an enclosure. Best for version two. for now however,the best option will probably be a dust cover for an external keyboard and a foam fan filter for the motor controller and final pc configuration.
| |
| *Suitability of plasma cutter?
| |
| *Potential improvements?
| |
| | |
| ==See Also==
| |
| *[[Lawrence_Kincheloe_Contract2]]
| |
| *[[XYZ Table]]
| |
| | |
| {{GVCS Footer}}
| |
