Prototype Assessment: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
*What worked as planned regarding the build? What didn't work as planned?
*What worked as planned regarding the build? What didn't work as planned?
*Describe the build sequence. Were you happy with the sequence? What could have been improved about the sequence?
*Describe the build sequence. Were you happy with the sequence? What could have been improved about the sequence?
*Were people utilized effectively throughout the build?
*Were people utilized effectively throughout the build? How could they have been used more effectively?
*What quality control measures were taken throughout the build?
*What quality control steps were taken throughout the build to assure build quality?
*What were the main build steps taken and what was their sequence?
*What were the main build steps taken and what was their sequence?
*How many human hours should each of the above steps take?
*How many person hours should each of the above steps take? How many person hours did each step take in practice?


==Quality Assessment and Performance Data==
==Quality Assessment and Performance Data==

Revision as of 03:03, 17 July 2013

Introduction

This is a template for documenting the lessons learned about a prototype build.

Assessment

Design Phase

  • Describe the steps taken in the design process. What went well in the design phase? What could have been done better?
  • Which steps in the design phase are easy to improve? Which are difficult to improve?
  • Were there steps that should have been taken but were missing? Were there steps that were taken that should have been omitted? Explain.
  • How did the design team feel about the design prior to the build and after the build?
  • Describe what the ideal design process should look like.

Build Preparation

  • Describe how the build preparation went.
  • Were you satisfied with the build preparation phase?
  • What were the issues that were encountered? How were they resolved?
  • Were the fabrication procedures satisfactory? What improvements could be made?
  • Discuss how you would like the ideal fabrication procedures/drawings to look like.

Build Phase

  • What worked as planned regarding the build? What didn't work as planned?
  • Describe the build sequence. Were you happy with the sequence? What could have been improved about the sequence?
  • Were people utilized effectively throughout the build? How could they have been used more effectively?
  • What quality control steps were taken throughout the build to assure build quality?
  • What were the main build steps taken and what was their sequence?
  • How many person hours should each of the above steps take? How many person hours did each step take in practice?

Quality Assessment and Performance Data

General

  • Did you see any safety violations throughout the build?
  • Were there any accidents? If so, how could they have been avoided?
  • Describe your general level of satisfaction with the overall design/build and the resulting quality of the product.
  • What are the lessons learned for improving future builds?
  • Was there any tool breakage? How could it have been avoided?
  • Quantify the consumables used throughout the build.
  • Any other comments or pressing issues not covered in this assessment?