OSE Specifications for Product Design: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To assess the technological design features of [[OSE Specifications]], these are the most important: | To assess the technological design features of [[OSE Specifications]], these are the most important: | ||
#Lifetime Design | #Lifetime Design. Achieved largely by bolt-together, [[Space Frame]] design. | ||
#Design for Scalability | #Design for Scalability | ||
#Modular Design | #Modular Design | ||
#Design for Fabrication | #Design for Fabrication | ||
#Simplicity | #Simplicity. Minimal parts count. Maximum redundancy of part types. | ||
#Low cost. Off-shelf parts. Minimum machining. | |||
#Meeting or exceeding industry standards | #Meeting or exceeding industry standards | ||
#Machine fit as part of a greater product ecology - on the component level, module level, and | #Machine fit as part of a greater product ecology - on the component level, module level, and | ||
#Designed as a Product Ecology - at the component, module, and machine level. | |||
The development process itself follows: | The development process itself follows: | ||
Revision as of 03:14, 2 August 2013
To assess the technological design features of OSE Specifications, these are the most important:
- Lifetime Design. Achieved largely by bolt-together, Space Frame design.
- Design for Scalability
- Modular Design
- Design for Fabrication
- Simplicity. Minimal parts count. Maximum redundancy of part types.
- Low cost. Off-shelf parts. Minimum machining.
- Meeting or exceeding industry standards
- Machine fit as part of a greater product ecology - on the component level, module level, and
- Designed as a Product Ecology - at the component, module, and machine level.
The development process itself follows:
- Test-Driven Design
- Modular Design
- Interface Design (Contract-First Manufacturing)