Levels of Openness: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "''Open source'' claimed by someone as open source is not open source if: *First and foremost - since this is the ''fake'' that applies to most of the impostors - '''If it rest...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''Open source'' claimed by someone as open source is not open source if:
''Open source'' claimed by someone as open source is not open source if:
*First and foremost - since this is the ''fake'' that applies to most of the impostors - '''If it restricts commercial use, such as by the [[NC Clause]] in Creative Commons licenses - it is not open source.'''
*First and foremost - since this is the ''fake'' that applies to most of the impostors - '''If it restricts commercial use, such as by the [[NC Clause]] in Creative Commons licenses - it is not open source.'''
Something is authentically open source even if it has the requirement that derivatives are likewise required to be shared free of charge.

Revision as of 07:27, 28 February 2016

Open source claimed by someone as open source is not open source if:

  • First and foremost - since this is the fake that applies to most of the impostors - If it restricts commercial use, such as by the NC Clause in Creative Commons licenses - it is not open source.

Something is authentically open source even if it has the requirement that derivatives are likewise required to be shared free of charge.