Open Science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added some more information.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Construction_Sets#Lab_Stuff The "Lab Stuff" Subsection of the "Construction Sets" Page] | *[https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Construction_Sets#Lab_Stuff The "Lab Stuff" Subsection of the "Construction Sets" Page] | ||
*[[Open-Source Lab]] | *[[Open-Source Lab]] | ||
=In Academia= | |||
In academia, for example, PhD theses are not published. They can be. [https://www.academia.edu/43006279/From_Open_Access_to_Open_Science_The_Path_From_Scientific_Reality_to_Open_Scientific_Communication]. Remarkably, or 1100 surveyed - 20% think that peer review is not important. One would think that review would be generally accepted as good. | |||
=Useful Links= | =Useful Links= | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory Wikipedia Page on Laboratories] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory Wikipedia Page on Laboratories] | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-it-yourself_biology Wikipedia Page on DIY Bio] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-it-yourself_biology Wikipedia Page on DIY Bio] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:31, 11 May 2020
See Also
In Academia
In academia, for example, PhD theses are not published. They can be. [1]. Remarkably, or 1100 surveyed - 20% think that peer review is not important. One would think that review would be generally accepted as good.