FIT XM Evaluation: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Graded 1-5 stars. As applicable, 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80%, 3 stars is 60%, etc. *Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


*Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran over 2 hours. 2 stars if 3 hour overrun.
*Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran over 2 hours. 2 stars if 3 hour overrun.
*Did everyone get a successful 3D print?
*Did everyone achieve a successful 3D print?
*Did the software work out of the box?
*Did the students follow a quality control checklist successfully?
*Did the Fellow perform checks according to a quality control checklist prior to first fire?
*Did the bed leveling procedure succeed within 15 minutes?
*Were all components and parts in working order in each kit?
*Were all components and parts in working order in each kit?
*Were their replacement parts available for any broken or missing parts?
*Were their replacement parts available for any broken or missing parts?
*Was the Build Manual complete and accurate?
*Was everyone able to access the Build Manual, and was the build manual complete and accurate?
*Did the Fellow provide teachable moments to participants?
*Did the Fellow provide teachable moments to participants and was the Fellow's attitude supportive? Was the Fellow able to answer build questions properly?  
*Was the Fellow's attitude supportive?
*Was the Fellow able to answer all the build questions from participants?  
*Reviews. What star rating did participants provide? See [[Workshop_Feedback_Form]]
*Reviews. What star rating did participants provide? See [[Workshop_Feedback_Form]]
*Did participants say they would recommend the workshop to someone else?
*Did participants say they would recommend the workshop to someone else?

Revision as of 02:32, 31 July 2018

Graded 1-5 stars. As applicable, 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80%, 3 stars is 60%, etc.

  • Duration. Was a 5 hour build time achieved? 4 stars if ran over 1 hour. 3 stars if ran over 2 hours. 2 stars if 3 hour overrun.
  • Did everyone achieve a successful 3D print?
  • Did the software work out of the box?
  • Did the students follow a quality control checklist successfully?
  • Did the Fellow perform checks according to a quality control checklist prior to first fire?
  • Did the bed leveling procedure succeed within 15 minutes?
  • Were all components and parts in working order in each kit?
  • Were their replacement parts available for any broken or missing parts?
  • Was everyone able to access the Build Manual, and was the build manual complete and accurate?
  • Did the Fellow provide teachable moments to participants and was the Fellow's attitude supportive? Was the Fellow able to answer build questions properly?
  • Reviews. What star rating did participants provide? See Workshop_Feedback_Form
  • Did participants say they would recommend the workshop to someone else?