Industrial Productivity on a Small Scale: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Discussion= | =Discussion= | ||
While OSE is not | While OSE is not producing a large number of printers in a centralized location, its small volume Extreme Manufacturing can yield good efficiency on a small scale. The question remains - can such production scale? Can the combined effect of many producers distribute wealth more, educate more people, empower more people - and do better in innovation and true service of human needs? | ||
Our route to that is training people to run such businesses, to fund growth of OSE development. To succeed at this means succeeding at providing livelihoods for the transformation of the | Our route to that is training people to run such businesses, to fund growth of OSE development. Our goal is Funding the Revolution. To succeed at this means succeeding at providing livelihoods for the transformation of the economy- to a system based on open source collaboration. This has the potential to unleash much creativity - raising the bar on human life satisfaction as various forms of competitive waste are eliminated. From the OSE big picture perspective, this has the potential to add freeDom to Peter Diamandis's [[6 Ds of Tech Disruption]]. | ||
=Distributed vs Centralized Production= | |||
As such, we are embarking on an experiment to determine whether simple open source design, distributed production, distributed quality control, and education can provide a better economic model of production. This relies on creating tools to empower people, and providing livelihood consistent with nonviolence. |
Revision as of 16:58, 19 February 2019
Can Distributed Production in Microfactories be More Efficient than Centralized Production?
Can a distributed open source business with distributed production provide higher efficiencies than centralized production?
This is important, as at stake is the capacity to educate for entrepreneurship as opposed to creating employees. Why is that good? As long as we can maintain industrial productivity with this method - we have more flexibility in terms of doing things with environmental and social consciousness. By doing this, we decrease bureaucracy. Increase meaning and satisfaction in peoples' lives. Contribute to creation of the world around us as opposed to creation of oversized structures.
Let's look at some data:
- Prusa Research sells 8000 printers per month, with 250 employees. That is 1 printer per person per day.
- Lulzbot - sells 1000 pritners per month, with 150 employees. That is 1/5 printer per person per day.
- Mahindra & Mahindra Tractors - make 1/6 tractor per person per day. Thousands of employees in their tractor division.
For comparison:
- OSE can make 12 quality controlled-printers per day, with Distributed Quality Control. See 3D Printer Production Engineering.
- OSE can make 1 tractor in one day with 4 people. So this is 1/4 tractor per person per day.
Discussion
While OSE is not producing a large number of printers in a centralized location, its small volume Extreme Manufacturing can yield good efficiency on a small scale. The question remains - can such production scale? Can the combined effect of many producers distribute wealth more, educate more people, empower more people - and do better in innovation and true service of human needs?
Our route to that is training people to run such businesses, to fund growth of OSE development. Our goal is Funding the Revolution. To succeed at this means succeeding at providing livelihoods for the transformation of the economy- to a system based on open source collaboration. This has the potential to unleash much creativity - raising the bar on human life satisfaction as various forms of competitive waste are eliminated. From the OSE big picture perspective, this has the potential to add freeDom to Peter Diamandis's 6 Ds of Tech Disruption.
Distributed vs Centralized Production
As such, we are embarking on an experiment to determine whether simple open source design, distributed production, distributed quality control, and education can provide a better economic model of production. This relies on creating tools to empower people, and providing livelihood consistent with nonviolence.