Neoliberal World Order: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It appears that neoliberal as a word is a faulty mental model or bias - as it is a very general term - a generalization. Which means that it is difficult to debate without getting into trouble - because the terms are not well-defined. | It appears that neoliberal as a word is a faulty mental model or bias - as it is a very general term - a generalization. Which means that it is difficult to debate without getting into trouble - because the terms are not well-defined. | ||
Neoliberal opposite - appears to be Keynesianism - [https://isreview.org/issue/105/trump-and-crisis-neoliberal-world-order] | Neoliberal opposite - appears to be Keynesianism - [https://isreview.org/issue/105/trump-and-crisis-neoliberal-world-order]. Or even protectionism like Trump is doing. | ||
The answer to environmental disaster (dirty production, say in China) is not protectionism. It's open source: raising the bar on everyone's performance. |
Revision as of 00:10, 11 October 2020
Be careful about Neoliberal. It is so broad in meaning that it serves only to slander - https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-opposite-of-neo-liberal-economic-school-of-thought-My-professor-warned-me-not-to-use-the-term-anti-neo-liberal-economists-in-my-thesis . Nobody calls themselves a neoliberal. It's only in reference to others?
It appears that neoliberal as a word is a faulty mental model or bias - as it is a very general term - a generalization. Which means that it is difficult to debate without getting into trouble - because the terms are not well-defined.
Neoliberal opposite - appears to be Keynesianism - [1]. Or even protectionism like Trump is doing.
The answer to environmental disaster (dirty production, say in China) is not protectionism. It's open source: raising the bar on everyone's performance.