Collaborative Singularity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The collaborative singularity can be seen as the opposite of the [[Technological Singularity]] - which does not rely on collaboration for its attainment, thus making its outcomes potentially dagnerouus. The inclusion of collaboration in human enterprise marks a turning point towards benign human development in harmony with both natural life support systems and anthropogenic technological systems. | The collaborative singularity can be seen as the opposite of the [[Technological Singularity]] - which does not rely on collaboration for its attainment, thus making its outcomes potentially dagnerouus. The inclusion of collaboration in human enterprise marks a turning point towards benign human development in harmony with both natural life support systems and anthropogenic technological systems. | ||
=Links= | |||
*[[Distributive Enterprise]] | |||
*[[Distributed Market Substitution]] | |||
*[[Economy of Affection]] | |||
*[[Collaborative Design]] |
Revision as of 22:01, 7 February 2021
The point in history when humans have learned to collaborate. It is a singularity - a unique condition - in that it marks the opposite of Western civilization to date, which relies on competition in its economic system. This competition manifests as the polar opposites - of prosperity for some, and deprivation for many others.
The collaborative singularity can be seen as the opposite of the Technological Singularity - which does not rely on collaboration for its attainment, thus making its outcomes potentially dagnerouus. The inclusion of collaboration in human enterprise marks a turning point towards benign human development in harmony with both natural life support systems and anthropogenic technological systems.