Pumped Hydroelectric Storage: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Updated the page to the more recent formatting style)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Basics=
*A Form of a "Gravity Battery" using water as the mass
*Essentially [[Hydroelectic Dams]] but modified to work "in reverse"
*So it functions as usual, but can be reversed, or use seperate pumps to store energy
=Marcin Calculations for [[FeF]] =
Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below.
Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below.


Line 21: Line 27:
[[Image:phs.jpg]]
[[Image:phs.jpg]]


==Option B==
===Option B===
Take a little further north, 18ft of head instead of 30.
Take a little further north, 18ft of head instead of 30.
*30 meter on each side pond, 2m deep - is 2000 cu m. Energy - MGH = 2M kg *10u*6u = 100MJ. That is 27 kWhr. Hydro is 90% efficient.[https://www.usbr.gov/power/edu/pamphlet.pdf]. Take 50% for our system. That is 12kWhr. could be good. Even if it's 6 kWhr - that is sufficient for an efficient house.
*30 meter on each side pond, 2m deep - is 2000 cu m. Energy - MGH = 2M kg *10u*6u = 100MJ. That is 27 kWhr. Hydro is 90% efficient.[https://www.usbr.gov/power/edu/pamphlet.pdf]. Take 50% for our system. That is 12kWhr. could be good. Even if it's 6 kWhr - that is sufficient for an efficient house.


=Working Doc=
==Working Doc==
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FXZjGWcSwAZYxykedo9sqP4YGUlJRRiDUnYzKFTzHnI/edit#slide=id.g5c3be0ce2d_1_28
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FXZjGWcSwAZYxykedo9sqP4YGUlJRRiDUnYzKFTzHnI/edit#slide=id.g5c3be0ce2d_1_28


=References=
==References==
*Pumped Hydroelectric Storage, Chi-Jen Yang - [[File:phs.pdf]]
*Pumped Hydroelectric Storage, Chi-Jen Yang - [[File:phs.pdf]]


=Turbine Sources=
==Turbine Sources==
*[[Pelton Wheel]] only - [http://www.thesolarbiz.com/Harris-Hydro-Pelton-Wheel#gsc.tab=0]
*[[Pelton Wheel]] only - [http://www.thesolarbiz.com/Harris-Hydro-Pelton-Wheel#gsc.tab=0]
*From Dan, look ethical and have good equipment - [http://www.rockyhydro.com/]
*From Dan, look ethical and have good equipment - [http://www.rockyhydro.com/]
Line 38: Line 44:
*Survey - http://www.zero.no/publikasjoner/small-scale-water-current-turbines-for-river-applications.pdf
*Survey - http://www.zero.no/publikasjoner/small-scale-water-current-turbines-for-river-applications.pdf


=Contacts=
==Contacts==
Contacted Regrarians, Permies, TED Fellows on Facebook.
Contacted Regrarians, Permies, TED Fellows on Facebook.


Line 54: Line 60:
*[[Concrete Energy Storage Calculations]]
*[[Concrete Energy Storage Calculations]]


=Links=
==Links==
* Alexander Slocum, MIT - ocean windmill storage - [http://www.technologyreview.com/article/517946/a-power-geek-making-stuff/]
* Alexander Slocum, MIT - ocean windmill storage - [http://www.technologyreview.com/article/517946/a-power-geek-making-stuff/]
* other OSE Wiki pages: [[Pelton Wheel]]
 
=Internal Links=
*[[Pelton Wheel]]
*Flow battery - the cheapest form of chemical storage possible - $1/kwhr for materials, and $10/kwhr for balance of system
*Flow battery - the cheapest form of chemical storage possible - $1/kwhr for materials, and $10/kwhr for balance of system
=External Links=
*
[[Category:Energy]]
[[Category:Energy]]

Revision as of 04:11, 2 March 2021

Basics

  • A Form of a "Gravity Battery" using water as the mass
  • Essentially Hydroelectic Dams but modified to work "in reverse"
  • So it functions as usual, but can be reversed, or use seperate pumps to store energy

Marcin Calculations for FeF

Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below.

Explanation:

Can we consider a storage hydro system that pumps during the day and generates electricity by night? Quick calculations: 1/4 acre pond, 6 foot deep. That is about 2000 cubic meters of water. Take another pond 10 m lower. The energy of water going from pond 1 to pond 2 (see drawing attached) is MgH = energy = [2000 cu m]x[1000kg/cu m]x[10 m/s^2]x[10 m] = 200 MJ 200 MJ = 200 MW for 1 second, or 200 kW for 1000 seconds, or 2 kW for 100,000 seconds - but assume 50% system efficiency (85% pumping, 85% generating, then 20% friction loss)

THAT IS over 24 HOURS OF 1KW OF POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!

Note Pelton turbines are 90% efficient [1]

Cost will be $1.5k in 4" pipe (about 1000 ft), $1k in power equipment, $10k in excavation + trenching for 2 ponds. If we have our own dozer, that will be $3k system cost. $3k for 24kWhr ($125/kwhr) of power storage appears to be comparable to batteries (38 whr costs $3 - or $75/kWhr for lithium batteries (which are not sustainable)). But lithium bats live 5 years or so - whereas PVC lives 400 years - so the gravity pond is a 100x better solution if we internalize lifetime design. Sure looks good on paper. Are these numbers sound?

2019 addendum: It gets more interesting with 3D printing. Each piece of pipe of 4", 10' long is $10, but if we 3D print these - then the cost of 4" PVC Pipe drops to 65 cents per 10 foot section (10 cents per lb from post-consumer waste plastic). So $100 per 24kWhrs of power. $5/kWhr cost is 10x better than batteries, and 1000x better over a lifetime.

If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.

Phs.jpg

Option B

Take a little further north, 18ft of head instead of 30.

  • 30 meter on each side pond, 2m deep - is 2000 cu m. Energy - MGH = 2M kg *10u*6u = 100MJ. That is 27 kWhr. Hydro is 90% efficient.[2]. Take 50% for our system. That is 12kWhr. could be good. Even if it's 6 kWhr - that is sufficient for an efficient house.

Working Doc

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FXZjGWcSwAZYxykedo9sqP4YGUlJRRiDUnYzKFTzHnI/edit#slide=id.g5c3be0ce2d_1_28

References

Turbine Sources

Contacts

Contacted Regrarians, Permies, TED Fellows on Facebook.

Hi Permies, I've been bouncing this pumped hydroelectric storage idea, which we are considering for a future workshop. This appears feasible at our site, with 30 feet of head, using two quarter acre ponds. I'm contacting http://www.canyonhydro.com/micro/microfaq.html#FAQ_HowMuchPwr to find out more about Pelton turbines - any ideas on other reputable Pelton turbine sources?

Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below. Explanation: Can we consider a storage hydro system that pumps during the day and generates electricity by night? Quick calculations: 1/4 acre pond, 6 foot deep. That is about 2000 cubic meters of water. Take another pond 10 m lower. The energy of water going from pond 1 to pond 2 (see drawing attached) is MgH = energy = [2000 cu m]x[1000kg/cu m]x[10 m/s^2]x[10 m] = 200 MJ 200 MJ = 200 MW for 1 second, or 200 kW for 1000 seconds, or 2 kW for 100,000 seconds - but assume 50% system efficiency (85% pumping, 85% generating, then 20% friction loss) THAT IS over 24 HOURS OF 1KW OF POWER!!!!!!!!!!!! Cost will be $1.5k in 4" pipe (about 1000 ft), $1k in power equipment, $10k in excavation + trenching for 2 ponds. If we have our own dozer, that will be $3k system cost. $3k for 24kWhr of power storage appears to beat batteries by a factor of 5-10 in cost. Sure looks good on paper. Are these numbers sound? If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.

Other Types of Gravity Storage

Links

  • Alexander Slocum, MIT - ocean windmill storage - [8]

Internal Links

  • Pelton Wheel
  • Flow battery - the cheapest form of chemical storage possible - $1/kwhr for materials, and $10/kwhr for balance of system

External Links