Battery Storage: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
*Question is more important than the answer in the talk above.
*Question is more important than the answer in the talk above.
*''Future should not be about solving one problem after another. It should be something that gets you excited''
*''Future should not be about solving one problem after another. It should be something that gets you excited''
=OSE Notes=
*Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in [[Nickel-Iron Batteries]] - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered.

Revision as of 18:38, 21 April 2022

  • 300TWhr of battery storage is necessary to transition to a renewable storage situation [1]
  • Question is more important than the answer in the talk above.
  • Future should not be about solving one problem after another. It should be something that gets you excited

OSE Notes

  • Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in Nickel-Iron Batteries - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered.