Daniel Schmachtenberger: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
*The Binding concept is correct. We must bind to regenerative use. The goal of the OSE experiment is to demonstrate a microcivilization (2400 person scale) which is regenerative and self-contained. This is to show that full  
*The Binding concept is correct. We must bind to regenerative use. The goal of the OSE experiment is to demonstrate a microcivilization (2400 person scale) which is regenerative and self-contained. This is to show that full  
More notes:
More notes:
*That solar cells in
*That solar cells 'raising the amount of fossil fuel use' is misleading. Solar cells have an energy payback time of about 1 year.


=Summary=
=Summary=

Revision as of 22:39, 8 August 2024

2024

  • Silicon Dreams and Carbon Nightmares - [1]

Good one. MJ Comments:

  • Fortunately, there are 2 majore safety valves for the total collapse: solar energy and the Hardware Compiler Problem
  • The hardware compiler problem indicates that while AI may seize all computation power, there is not a clear link between computational power and physical translation to reality - without an intermediary in the form of a 'compiler.' This compiler is not trivial to build. MJ guesses that once the compiler problem is recognized, there will be a tendency to mid-course correct towards full regeneration.
  • The Binding concept is correct. We must bind to regenerative use. The goal of the OSE experiment is to demonstrate a microcivilization (2400 person scale) which is regenerative and self-contained. This is to show that full

More notes:

  • That solar cells 'raising the amount of fossil fuel use' is misleading. Solar cells have an energy payback time of about 1 year.

Summary

We are at a point of existential risk via a collapse of sensemaking in a world of exponential technology.

An eloquent collapsitarian viewpoint, with solutions consisting of a mind shift.

Governance solutions -

Ethical downward selection is mentioned.

Individualistic thinking is an issue mentioned. Solution is We.

Antirivalry is a solution. Master one's own self first.

Humans are fragile - we are more vulnerable because we make our own niches.

Recognizing connectedness. Cognitive aspect is a start. Such as what we are w

Psychadelics, meditation.

Hopeful or pesimistic? It's a shift from single cell to multiple cell. Exponential increase in human capacity is a terminal process.

Evolution by design.

it will require learning a bunch of shit that you don't already know

Apex predator - human - as tech gets us technology of gods, we need to match that with the wisdom of gods.

Nature of evolution is nonlinear. What are the necessary and sufficient criteria for nonextinction.

Political leaders are not part of the solution.

Caterpillar metaphor - you cannot predict that a destroyer turns into a productive pollinator.

Nonlinear phase shift.

Rivalrous dynamics self-terminate.

Individual sense-making is not sufficient.

Stop trying to win at the dying game.

Conflict resolution is first.

Can't follow the old manual. The new manual doesn't exist yet.

Things to do: working on the future of education, and how to facilitate the development of young humans to be healthy, sovereign humans.

Consilience Project

Holy shit - In the last 20 years, the internet and social media have radically transformed and fragmented the media landscape. With the decline of subscription-based news and investigative journalism, the rise of consolidated media companies aligned with partisan aims, and the development of social media’s algorithmically driven filter-bubbles that reinforce bias and tribalism, the ideas of “trusted authorities” and shared truth have largely collapsed. - https://www.civilizationresearchinstitute.org/our-projects

Notes

We should connect with this guy - he said something about launching a 'frist product in Q1 of 2021'. If this guy is a serious supercooperator, then I'm inclined to conclude that his product is open source - otherwise he's just talking shit, ie, his actions do not match his words. My take on this is that it only takes a few people to launch a few good products that result is a cascade of distributed market substitution - ie, a historic economic shift that is a byproduct of the collaborative logic. https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Distributed_Market_Substitution