Prototyping Plan 2013 Negotiations: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Many GVCS projects build upon other prior art in the open source domain. Other projects rely on contributions of professionals who are willing to share IP based on the for...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Many [[GVCS]] projects build upon other prior art in the open source domain. Other projects rely on contributions of professionals who are willing to share IP based on the for-benefit mission of Open Source Ecology. Other projects are more in the [[IP Rescue]] category - where OSE either unburies and publishes hard-to-find materias - or pays developers outright to open-source their IP. The latter works particularly well with consultants, who may not be interested in starting their own businesses - so they are willing to generate open IP as long as they are paid. Here are some projects that | Many [[GVCS]] projects build upon other prior art that is already in the open source domain. Other projects rely on contributions of professionals who are willing to share IP based on the for-benefit mission of Open Source Ecology. Other projects are more in the [[IP Rescue]] category - where OSE either unburies and publishes hard-to-find materias - or pays developers outright to open-source their IP. The latter works particularly well with consultants, who may not be interested in starting their own businesses - so they are willing to generate open IP as long as they are paid. The most challenging case for opening up desirable IP is when developers think, in nearly all cases erroneously - they will be making millions with their innovations - unaware that only [[3% of Patents]] end up making money. For these potential collaborators, we proceed by informing them that 'making millions by patenting innovations' is a towards the common good will not bring them more financial gain. Here are some projects that OSE is | ||
Revision as of 14:18, 4 April 2013
Many GVCS projects build upon other prior art that is already in the open source domain. Other projects rely on contributions of professionals who are willing to share IP based on the for-benefit mission of Open Source Ecology. Other projects are more in the IP Rescue category - where OSE either unburies and publishes hard-to-find materias - or pays developers outright to open-source their IP. The latter works particularly well with consultants, who may not be interested in starting their own businesses - so they are willing to generate open IP as long as they are paid. The most challenging case for opening up desirable IP is when developers think, in nearly all cases erroneously - they will be making millions with their innovations - unaware that only 3% of Patents end up making money. For these potential collaborators, we proceed by informing them that 'making millions by patenting innovations' is a towards the common good will not bring them more financial gain. Here are some projects that OSE is