Torch Table Build: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Proposal= | =Proposal= | ||
See proposal at http://openfarmtech.org/Lawrence_Proposal.pdf | See proposal at http://openfarmtech.org/Lawrence_Proposal.pdf . You can also see the working agreement,[[Lawrence Kincheloe Contract]] | ||
=Design Rationale= | =Design Rationale= | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 22 August 2009
Proposal
See proposal at http://openfarmtech.org/Lawrence_Proposal.pdf . You can also see the working agreement,Lawrence Kincheloe Contract
Design Rationale
- Rack for x motion - cheapest, most robust solution for precise motion
- Spring-loaded x and y motors
Working Concepts
X axis
Y axis
Z axis
Blender Concept
Torch vs. Plasma Cutter
- Comes down to initial cost versus long-term cost
- Plasma cutters - consumables cost $20 for 5 new electrodes and nozzle heads
- Electrodes are rated for 45 minutes to 60 minutes for 1/2" steel
- More expensive versions state they last 4 times longer - are heavier and have better temperature control
- For anything above 1 inch, torch is better
Team
- Deep in the continental US underground...
