Review Team: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Abstraction of the process can involve review templates and procedures, step-by-step instructions, flow charts, infographics, etc. Open Source [[BPM]] software may be used to facilitate/automate the process. | Abstraction of the process can involve review templates and procedures, step-by-step instructions, flow charts, infographics, etc. Open Source [[BPM]] software may be used to facilitate/automate the process. | ||
==Components== | |||
*Technology review | |||
*Process review | |||
*Standards review | |||
*Organizational review | |||
*Financial review | |||
* | |||
=Review and Testing= | =Review and Testing= | ||
Best suited are users, individuals who have CAE capacity, computer simulation experience, practical experience | |||
==LifeTrac and Agriculture Equipment== | ==LifeTrac and Agriculture Equipment== |
Latest revision as of 02:10, 15 December 2014
Intro
The goal of the review team is to improve the designs. The first step in the review process is that the review team review the analysis/calculation tools themselves - and review the protocol that one should follow for review.
The critical aspect of proper review is abstraction of the process. Abstraction of the process allows development logic to be applied, eventually towards automated review by virtue of artificial intelligence.
Abstraction of the process can involve review templates and procedures, step-by-step instructions, flow charts, infographics, etc. Open Source BPM software may be used to facilitate/automate the process.
Components
- Technology review
- Process review
- Standards review
- Organizational review
- Financial review
Review and Testing
Best suited are users, individuals who have CAE capacity, computer simulation experience, practical experience
LifeTrac and Agriculture Equipment
- John O'Meara - rake, combine, baler, tractor