OSE Enterprise Brainstorming: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
*[[Innocentive]]  model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
*[[Innocentive]]  model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]
*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]
 
*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.
=OSE Narrative=
=OSE Narrative=
What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?
What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

Revision as of 16:31, 20 February 2019

Possible approaches:

OSE Narrative

What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.

Learnings

  • 99 Designs - We find that higher financial incentives do not translate to more effort by individual designers, but nonetheless have an impact on the quality outcome of contests by attracting a larger pool of designers - [3]
  • Interesting HeroX challenge - $1M student space rocket challenge. Organized by Base 11. [4]