Dirk Janssen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*We would develop for O&O - R&D equivalent. Onderzoek en Ontwerp. | *We would develop for O&O - R&D equivalent. Onderzoek en Ontwerp. | ||
*There are good teachers that could be doing our work. | *There are good teachers that could be doing our work. | ||
*There is a school that is good. |
Revision as of 20:44, 20 February 2019
- Curriculum package - big companies develop eng curriculum
- Stiftung Gymnasium - they provide curruculum, teachers have apathy because they are forced to teach something that has been thrown upon then
- Will teach 3D printer course - with lifecycle assessment.
- Board CAD - https://sourceforge.net/projects/boardcad/files/latest/download
- School pays money to Foundation to generate curriculum
- Teachers are required to file new ideas for curriculum every year. One block every 6 weeks.
- Teachers are short of ideas. They can't design ideas themselves - but external companies. STEM should be about companies.
- In practice, no companies are interested.
- What if it is OSE?
- Teachers would love it. Teacher provides it to Foundation. Dirk thinks this could work.
- Colleague is working with schools.
- This other person can tell what is needed.
- Format for what is needed. Will it be manageable - or will it be nonsense.
- Most of the time - the Foundation doesn't understand what they are handling.
- What they handle is secret. Why? Because it is horrible.
- FUBAR curriculum.
- We would develop for O&O - R&D equivalent. Onderzoek en Ontwerp.
- There are good teachers that could be doing our work.
- There is a school that is good.