Coal Tar vs Biomass Tar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added some more information) |
(Added some more links under the "Internal Links" section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=Internal Links= | =Internal Links= | ||
*[[Tar]] | |||
*[[Pitch]] | |||
*[[Asphalt]] | |||
*[[Bio-Tar]] | |||
*[[Bio-Pitch]] | |||
*[[Bio-Asphalt]] | |||
*[[Pyrolysis Oil]] | *[[Pyrolysis Oil]] | ||
*[[Biocrude]] | *[[Biocrude]] | ||
Revision as of 02:52, 21 June 2020
Basics
- Both can be produced intentially, or as a pollutant
- Can lead to clogging of equipment
- Have uses, but may be carcinogenic, ESPECIALLY coal tar (mainly preservation/waterproofing but SUPPOSEDLY coal tar was/is used for MEDICINE ?
- Need to see if due to minerals or benzene
- Benzene was first produced via pyrolisis of coal tar, and thus may be removed in that manner?
- Also dig for analysis on content, and volume, of tar from various systems (gassification, combustion, pyrolysis, fluidized versions...)