Growth Ratio: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*If investors fund startup - then it's 25% of first year net - or $3⁰0k | *If investors fund startup - then it's 25% of first year net - or $3⁰0k | ||
*This means - initial idea was $60k invest per operation. Here it's $300k invest per operation. If we do 2x ROI for investor, we are at $600k net earnings for entrepreneur | *This means - initial idea was $60k invest per operation. Here it's $300k invest per operation. If we do 2x ROI for investor, we are at $600k net earnings for entrepreneur | ||
*This all assumes 6 month breakeven in the Core Enterprise Module, which is outstanding. If this were achieved, then we have [[DMS]]. | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 22 June 2022
- For 100x growth in one year (of the Core Enterprise Module as a working example), 2x ROI for investor (which guarantees funding in a second) means 10% tithe on business owner ($120k) out of $1.2 net or still above an emm.
- If growth is 100x, then investment was about $6M.
- Does $6M get us to execution of marketing, if that is Assumed as key block?
- This means hiring performance marketing at $4M, 30 full time staff to process 2400 acceptances into the program at $70k salary.
- Missing link here is enterprise startup, at $250k/pop minimum. This could be Chambers of Commerce and civic orgs
- Tuition model addresses the cost of training. Tech schools and community colleges
- If investors fund startup - then it's 25% of first year net - or $3⁰0k
- This means - initial idea was $60k invest per operation. Here it's $300k invest per operation. If we do 2x ROI for investor, we are at $600k net earnings for entrepreneur
- This all assumes 6 month breakeven in the Core Enterprise Module, which is outstanding. If this were achieved, then we have DMS.