Taxation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==MJ Critique== | ==MJ Critique== | ||
*Leveling of the playing field, and consequently - mutually assured abundance - is a prerequisite for any libertarian or geolibertarian program. This assumption is not | *Leveling of the playing field, and consequently - mutually assured abundance - is a prerequisite for any libertarian or geolibertarian program. This assumption is not met in a scarcity-based economic system of today, and thus the libertarian program is broken, requiring a modification. Thus, we are in agreement on the usefulness of a market-based solution, but not based on the current market. The missing aspect of that market is [[Moral Intelligence]]. | ||
* | *Rent is proposed as the universal solution. This seems to miss, once again, that the playing field is not level. Renting is problematic - just like buying things - for those who are at the bottom of the economic pyramid. | ||
*Seemst that the [[Open Sector]] addresses the issue of tax, where low cost is the first solution, and the second solution is surplus value generated from paying customers is used to subsidize poorer customers - instead of the surplus value going to stockholders. This is essentially doubly- [[Non-Redistributive]] - therefore good: first, people do not pay taxes but pay directly; second, honest Open Sector enterprise gets the gains, not stockholders. The difficulty of this paradigm, however, is that this requires morally-intelligent open sector agents to execute the enterprise. OSE's solution is to develop such morally-intelligent entrepreneurs, and it is OSE's core educational activity. | *Seemst that the [[Open Sector]] addresses the issue of tax, where low cost is the first solution, and the second solution is surplus value generated from paying customers is used to subsidize poorer customers - instead of the surplus value going to stockholders. This is essentially doubly- [[Non-Redistributive]] - therefore good: first, people do not pay taxes but pay directly; second, honest Open Sector enterprise gets the gains, not stockholders. The difficulty of this paradigm, however, is that this requires morally-intelligent open sector agents to execute the enterprise. OSE's solution is to develop such morally-intelligent entrepreneurs, and it is OSE's core educational activity. | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 30 September 2023
OSE Solution
OSE proposed that tax burden is removed by creation of the Open Sector - efficient enterprises for providing goods and services whith the government is otherwise tasked with.
Government without Taxes
MJ Critique
- Leveling of the playing field, and consequently - mutually assured abundance - is a prerequisite for any libertarian or geolibertarian program. This assumption is not met in a scarcity-based economic system of today, and thus the libertarian program is broken, requiring a modification. Thus, we are in agreement on the usefulness of a market-based solution, but not based on the current market. The missing aspect of that market is Moral Intelligence.
- Rent is proposed as the universal solution. This seems to miss, once again, that the playing field is not level. Renting is problematic - just like buying things - for those who are at the bottom of the economic pyramid.
- Seemst that the Open Sector addresses the issue of tax, where low cost is the first solution, and the second solution is surplus value generated from paying customers is used to subsidize poorer customers - instead of the surplus value going to stockholders. This is essentially doubly- Non-Redistributive - therefore good: first, people do not pay taxes but pay directly; second, honest Open Sector enterprise gets the gains, not stockholders. The difficulty of this paradigm, however, is that this requires morally-intelligent open sector agents to execute the enterprise. OSE's solution is to develop such morally-intelligent entrepreneurs, and it is OSE's core educational activity.