How to Respond to a Counterclaim: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
=Strategies=
=Strategies=
#Produce evidence for outright denial, and motion for summary judgment with legal basis, with supporting affidavits ([[74.04]]). Motion for summary judgment may include the issue of liability alone.
#Produce evidence for outright denial, and motion for summary judgment with legal basis, with supporting affidavits ([[74.04]]). Motion for summary judgment may include the issue of liability alone.
##Determine clear uncontroversial vs in-good-faith disputed facts

Revision as of 23:40, 7 July 2024

Howto

  1. Get a copy of the claim
  2. Examime the counts of the claim
  3. Respond to each point in the claim
  4. If it is not clear what is being asked, ask.
  5. Watch out for trickery:
    1. Vague claims that elicit voluntary information that abets the opposition's case
    2. Intentionally misleading claims which trap one to admit something that is not relevant but supports the opposition's case
    3. Absence of any evidence, where opposition is seeking for you to incriminate yourself by things inadvertently said and distored
    4. Manipulation of words or distortion which aims to produce fault if not rebutted correctly
    5. Using technical terms or words with double meanings with aim to mislead

Responses

  1. Admit or deny
  2. Ask for further information, clarification, specificity
  3. Request further information or evidence for you to accept or deny the claim
  4. Don't accept or deny, leave up for the court.

Strategies

  1. Produce evidence for outright denial, and motion for summary judgment with legal basis, with supporting affidavits (74.04). Motion for summary judgment may include the issue of liability alone.
    1. Determine clear uncontroversial vs in-good-faith disputed facts