Open Source Ecology Paradigm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Frequently, people ask me how the OSE Paradigm can compete with China. #When IP access barriers are eliminated in the open source economy, cost of production is reduced to produ...") |
Matt Maier (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
#When IP access barriers are eliminated in the open source economy, cost of production is reduced to production capitalization and labor. | #When IP access barriers are eliminated in the open source economy, cost of production is reduced to production capitalization and labor. | ||
#Cost of production capitalization, under the assumption of flexible fabrication assisted by automation - goes to zero in the scenario of community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every community) | #Cost of production capitalization, under the assumption of flexible fabrication assisted by automation - goes to zero in the scenario of community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every community) | ||
#In the open | #In the open source economy of DIY ethic and local production capacity and transparency - the cost of labor goes to zero. | ||
#Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, such as nickel-iron batteries, the concept ofTherefore, i 'profit' goes away, as the battery production becomes a service. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost, defined as external cost - goes to zero. | #Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, such as nickel-iron batteries, the concept ofTherefore, i 'profit' goes away, as the battery production becomes a service. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost, defined as external cost - goes to zero. | ||
#Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological transparency, a a technologically-literate populace of the open source age. | #Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological transparency, a a technologically-literate populace of the open source age. | ||
#Technological literacy is facilitated by introduction of true technical education, not industry standard marketing forces. | #Technological literacy is facilitated by introduction of true technical education, not industry standard marketing forces. | ||
Revision as of 11:08, 24 December 2011
Frequently, people ask me how the OSE Paradigm can compete with China.
- When IP access barriers are eliminated in the open source economy, cost of production is reduced to production capitalization and labor.
- Cost of production capitalization, under the assumption of flexible fabrication assisted by automation - goes to zero in the scenario of community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every community)
- In the open source economy of DIY ethic and local production capacity and transparency - the cost of labor goes to zero.
- Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, such as nickel-iron batteries, the concept ofTherefore, i 'profit' goes away, as the battery production becomes a service. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost, defined as external cost - goes to zero.
- Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological transparency, a a technologically-literate populace of the open source age.
- Technological literacy is facilitated by introduction of true technical education, not industry standard marketing forces.