Questions

How do we address the exciting aspect of problem-solving and design for making a better world if people can be paid only for building homes (according to current snapshot)?
1. Solutions: add other elements - automated machines and 3d printing into the promise.
2. Promise the 'we did it so you can, too' - which is deliverable pending RTF and LTL infrastructure - but otherwise, this is for the outliers and is not the norm
  1. This would allow us to determine if our average student turns out to be a collaborator - did we really succeed in teaching collaborative culture in 4 years?
Do we position as Apprenticeship or Fellowship?

Distinctions and Scope

Apprenticeship is about building. Not easy to position as 'civilization building' because that is not readily apparent. Solution: raise the bar to distinctions of how we build to make a ready case. Such as: PV on every home. Zero energy house. Aquaponic Greenhouse Business Model, Hydrogen Filling Station added - along with automated heavy machines - along with 3D printing - and we are in business.
Fellowship is about designing a new civilization.

Lifelong learning
Design, build, enterprise teaching for solving pressing world issues
Serious learning curve takes time, such as 4 years even if RLF and LTL is applied.

Same as above, except the target audience is a progressive problemsolver.
Getting excited about 'leveling the playing field', 'rigorous discipline and skill set', 'high performance and willing to do what it takes to get there'

Apprenticeship takes you to being a builder.
'We did it so you can do it' for enterprise is dubious. This is for outliers, not the masses in the usual sense. Genius of And: it is possible if the quality of our program is sufficient.